Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 41 | — |
| Success rate | 58.5% | 18th / 321 |
| Explosive run rate | 17.1% | 78th / 321 |
| Stuffed at the line | 7.3% | 28th / 321 |
| First downs | 17 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 11 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 1 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 5 | — |
| Target share | 5.1% | — |
| Catch rate | 60.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 40.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 6.2 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 20.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 0 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Thevenin's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted6 targets charted
Run direction57 carries
2025 charting · Louisiana Tech
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (6 of Thevenin’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted18 targets charted
Run direction53 carries
Career
2 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Rutgers#92 · 2-4 | 6 | 36% | 59 | 289 | 4.9 | 4 | 58.5% | 4 | 41 | 1 | 5.1% |
| 2025 |  Louisiana Tech#80 · 8-5 | 13 | 43% | 131 | 634 | 4.8 | 8 | 41.5% | 33 | 269 | 0 | 13.5% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Clay Thevenin's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Clay Thevenin's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
Howard
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 59 | — |
| Yards | 289 | 180th / 1456 |
| Yards / carry | 4.9 | 136th / 325 |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 91st / 631 |
| Long | 26 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 4 | 1115th / 1995 |
| Yards | 41 | 1129th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 10.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 346th / 825 |
| Long | 19 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4244th / 5408 |
| Solo | 0 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Massachusetts | 62 | ~15 (10–19) | 4 | 24% |
| Wk 2 · Boston College | 68 | ~20 (14–26) | 8 | 29% |
| Wk 3 · USC | 69 | ~17 (12–22) | 6 | 25% |
| Wk 4 · Howard | 72 | ~27 (18–35) | 16 | 38% |
| Wk 5 · Indiana | 55 | ~24 (16–31) | 13 | 44% |
| Wk 7 · Maryland | 74 | ~39 (27–51) | 19 | 53% |
| Season | 400 | 142 (113–175) | 66 | 36% |
Position Room
7 RBs on the Rutgers roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antwan Raymond | RB | 105 | 498 | 4.7 | 5 | 11 | +0.15 | ||
| Clay Thevenin | RB | 59 | 289 | 4.9 | 4 | 4 | +0.23 | ||
| 32 | Aiden Gibson | RB | FR | 11 | 35 | 3.2 | 0 | — | +0.04 |
| 20 | Ja'shon Benjamin | RB | SR | 3 | 12 | 4 | 0 | — | +0.05 |
| 22 | Michael Dukes III | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | Edd Guerrier | RB | JR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | Terrell Mitchell | RB | SO | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Rutgers depth chart →