Snap share
65%
6 of 7 started · likely 63–86%
Tackles
41
181st of 5408 in FBS
Solo
18
Tackles for loss
10
7th of 2450 in FBS
Sacks
7
3rd of 1212 in FBS
Interceptions
0
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Defense | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Havoc plays | 10 | 20th / 2573 |
| Tackles for loss | 10 | 9th / 1911 |
| Run stops | 26 | 24th / 3263 |
| Sacks | 7 | — |
| Pass breakups | 0 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Forced fumbles | 0 | — |
| Tackles | 36 | — |
Game Log
Andrew Zock's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
8.8 avg. game scoreBest: 10.0 at Eastern Michigan (Week 7)4 of 7 games at 8.0+
| Defense | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 | @ Michigan State | L 20–30 | 7.6 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | · | · |
| 2 |  Central Connecticut | W 63–10 | 7.8 | 4 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3 | 0 | · | · |
| 3 |  Temple | W 49–48 | 9.4 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 4 |  San Diego State | W 41–16 | 7.7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 5 | @ Ball State | W 39–24 | 9.7 | 3 | 2 | 2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 6 |  Buffalo | L 8–23 | 9.7 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 1.5 | 2 | 0 | · | · |
| 7 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 34–14 | 10.0 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | · | · |
| 2026 · 7 games | 8.8 | 41 | 18 | 10 | 7 | 15 | 0 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 41 | 181st / 5408 |
| Solo | 18 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 10 | 7th / 2450 |
| Sacks | 7 | 3rd / 1212 |
| QB hurries | 15 | 2nd / 1380 |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 0 | — |
| Lost | 0 | — |
| Recovered | 2 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Opp. plays | Est. snaps | Plays made | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Michigan State | ✓ DE | 83 | ~47 (23–59) | 4 | · | 57% |
| Wk 2 · Central Connecticut | ✓ DE | 59 | ~36 (14–57) | 4 | · | 61% |
| Wk 3 · Temple | ✓ DE | 72 | ~48 (24–60) | 7 | · | 67% |
| Wk 4 · San Diego State | ✓ DE | 68 | ~41 (20–52) | 4 | · | 60% |
| Wk 5 · Ball State | — | 61 | ~39 (15–61) | 3 | · | 64% |
| Wk 6 · Buffalo | ✓ DE | 77 | ~56 (28–71) | 9 | 1 | 73% |
| Wk 7 · Eastern Michigan | ✓ DE | 71 | ~53 (26–67) | 8 | 3 | 75% |
| Season | 6 GS | 491 | 320 (307–424) | 39 | 4 | 65% |
Position Room
22 DLs on the Toledo roster, ordered by tkl
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew Zock | DE | 41 | 10 | 7 | — | 0 | ||
| 90 | Zach Johnson | DE | SO | 22 | 4.5 | 2 | — | 0 |
| 96 | Nathaniel Chandler | DL | JR | 14 | 1 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 2 | Ezra Odinjor | DE | JR | 11 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 |
| 52 | Lucas Lambert-Pipkin | DT | JR | 11 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 |
| 99 | Caden Camese | DT | SR | 9 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 |
| 95 | Wayne Peart II | DL | SO | 8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 |
| 21 | Ben Sahakian | DE | SR | 5 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 98 | Micah Fils-Aime | DT | FR | 5 | 0.5 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 92 | Tommy Huss | DE | JR | 4 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 94 | Adrian Love Jr. | DT | FR | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 37 | Desmond Okantey | DE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | Cam Gwinn | DT | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | Tyrell O'Neal | DT | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | Tyrell O'Neal | DT | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 48 | Jordin Farrow | DT | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 51 | Zackery Samuel | DE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 53 | Samuel Toniolo | DE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Josh Lee | DE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 91 | Laith Shamma | DT | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 93 | Leonard Sharp | DL | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 97 | Brian Stovall Jr. | DE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes —+ plays per team game. Toledo depth chart →