EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 51 | — |
| Success rate | 37.3% | 267th / 321 |
| Explosive run rate | 7.8% | 278th / 321 |
| Stuffed at the line | 9.8% | 64th / 321 |
| First downs | 11 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 11 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 4 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 5 | — |
| Target share | 5.7% | — |
| Catch rate | 20.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 0.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 0.4 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Where Ison's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Autavius Ison's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ | L 20–30 | — | 1 | -2 | -2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | W 63–10 | 6.0 | 7 | 33 | 4.7 | 1 | 9 | |
| 3 | W 49–48 | 4.1 | 4 | 12 | 3.0 | 0 | 8 | |
| 4 | W 41–16 | 6.4 | 15 | 89 | 5.9 | 0 | 27 | |
| 5 | @ | W 39–24 | 4.7 | 12 | 43 | 3.6 | 0 | 9 |
| 6 | L 8–23 | 5.1 | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 0 | 11 | |
| 7 | @ | W 34–14 | 5.9 | 18 | 104 | 5.8 | 1 | 42 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 5.4 | 60 | 296 | 4.9 | 2 | 42 | ||
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 60 | — |
| Yards | 296 | 171st / 1456 |
| Yards / carry | 4.9 | 136th / 325 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 221st / 631 |
| Long | 42 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 1 | 1613th / 1995 |
| Yards | 2 | 1929th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 2 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 2 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 1 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Michigan State | 41 | ~5 (1–10) | 2 | 12% |
| Wk 2 · Central Connecticut | 77 | ~16 (11–21) | 7 | 21% |
| Wk 3 · Temple | 76 | ~10 (2–19) | 4 | 13% |
| Wk 4 · San Diego State | 70 | ~22 (15–29) | 15 | 31% |
| Wk 5 · Ball State | 86 | ~23 (16–30) | 12 | 27% |
| Wk 6 · Buffalo | 61 | ~10 (2–19) | 5 | 16% |
| Wk 7 · Eastern Michigan | 70 | ~38 (26–49) | 20 | 54% |
| Season | 481 | 124 (98–153) | 65 | 26% |
8 RBs on the Toledo roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | CJ Miller | RB | JR | 76 | 426 | 5.6 | 6 | 8 | +0.23 |
| Connor Walendzak | RB | 73 | 424 | 5.8 | 7 | 12 | +0.14 | ||
| 4 | Autavius Ison | RB | JR | 60 | 296 | 4.9 | 2 | 1 | -0.10 |
| 23 | Noah Sanders | RB | FR | 10 | 42 | 4.2 | 0 | 1 | -0.02 |
| 20 | Corey Smith | RB | SO | 7 | 30 | 4.3 | 0 | — | +0.24 |
| Kadale Williams | RB | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | — | -0.22 | ||
| 27 | Dane Nauman | RB | SO | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | — | +0.46 |
| 29 | Tanner Rubinstein | FB | SR | — | — | — | — | 1 | +1.08 |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Toledo depth chart →