Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 13 | — |
| Target share | 15.7% | — |
| Catch rate | 84.6% | — |
| Success rate per target | 61.5% | — |
| Yards per target | 7.1 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Furtney's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted12 targets charted
Game Log
Jake Furtney's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Nebraska | L 21–49 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 |  Jacksonville State | W 29–27 | 2.3 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | @ South Alabama | L 36–41 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 4 |  Stonehill | W 35–7 | 6.4 | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 0 | 11 |
| 5 | @ Kent State | W 13–10 | 5.8 | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 0 | 16 |
| 6 |  Central Michigan | W 31–14 | 7.2 | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 0 | 16 |
| 7 | @ Sacramento State | W 48–7 | 6.0 | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 0 | 15 |
| 2026 · 5 games | 5.5 | 11 | 106 | 9.6 | 0 | 16 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 11 | 520th / 1994 |
| Yards | 106 | 631st / 1980 |
| Yards / catch | 9.6 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 16 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 2 · Jacksonville State | — | 66 | ~36 (17–51) | 2 | · | 55% |
| Wk 4 · Stonehill | ✓ TE | 71 | ~38 (18–54) | 4 | · | 54% |
| Wk 5 · Kent State | ✓ TE | 55 | ~35 (16–50) | 2 | 1 | 64% |
| Wk 6 · Central Michigan | — | 67 | ~52 (44–63) | 3 | · | 78% |
| Wk 7 · Sacramento State | ✓ TE | 64 | ~40 (34–48) | 2 | · | 63% |
| Season | 3 GS | 447 | 201 (170–243) | 13 | 1 | 45% |
Position Room
7 TEs on the Ohio roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33 | Jake Furtney | TE | SO | 11 | 106 | 0 | 13% | +0.30 |
| 85 | Riley Palmeter | TE | SR | 5 | 61 | 0 | 4% | -1.03 |
| 84 | AJ Miller | TE | SO | 4 | 36 | 1 | 5% | -0.20 |
| 86 | Andrew Metzger | TE | SO | 3 | 25 | 0 | 4% | +0.13 |
| 44 | Aiden Lowery | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 82 | Calvin Moody | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Tim Boals | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Ohio depth chart →