Snap share
55%
4 of 5 started · likely 47–67%
Receptions
15
356th of 1995 in FBS
Rec. yards
122
558th of 1981 in FBS
Yards / catch
8.1
420th of 461 in FBS
Rec. TD
0
EPA / play
-0.06
23 plays

Efficiency & Role

EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies

EPA per play by situation

23 plays · -1.5 total EPA · not enough plays to rank yet
All plays-0.06
Passing-0.06
1st down+0.61
2nd down-0.37
3rd down-0.41
Standard downs+0.01
Passing downs-0.22
WilliamsWR/TE average

Share of team plays

How often the offense runs through this player. Pass = targets or dropbacks, rush = carries
All plays7%
Pass plays12%
Run plays0%
1st down7%
2nd down5%
3rd down7%
Standard downs7%
Passing downs7%
WilliamsWR/TE average

Advanced

Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume

ReceivingValueFBS rank
Targets20—
Target share13.4%386th / 523
Catch rate65.0%265th / 523
Success rate per target35.0%447th / 523
Yards per target4.8484th / 523
Explosive catches0.0%479th / 523
Deep-target rate5.0%—
3rd-down targets5—
Red-zone targets1—

Charting

Where Williams's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play

Targets
23
15 caught (65%)
Avg. depth of target
6.9
air yards per target
YAC per catch
2.2
33 yds after the catch
Air yards caught
89
of 122 yds on charted catches
Deep targets
9%
20+ air yards

Where he's targeted23 targets charted

65% comp6.9 avg. depth2.2 YAC/catch9% 20+ air yds0–0 TD–INT
101020203030LOSLeft, Behind air yards: noneLeft, 0–4 air yards: 5 targets (22%), 4 caught (80%), 21 yds, 4.2 per target580% · 21yLeft, 5–9 air yards: 1 targets (4%), 0 caught (0%), 0 yds, 0.0 per target10% · 0yLeft, 10–14 air yards: noneLeft, 15–19 air yards: noneLeft, 20–29 air yards: noneLeft, 30+ air yards: noneMiddle, Behind air yards: noneMiddle, 0–4 air yards: noneMiddle, 5–9 air yards: 3 targets (13%), 2 caught (67%), 14 yds, 4.7 per target367% · 14yMiddle, 10–14 air yards: 2 targets (9%), 1 caught (50%), 19 yds, 9.5 per target250% · 19yMiddle, 15–19 air yards: 1 targets (4%), 0 caught (0%), 0 yds, 0.0 per target10% · 0yMiddle, 20–29 air yards: 2 targets (9%), 1 caught (50%), 22 yds, 11.0 per target250% · 22yMiddle, 30+ air yards: noneRight, Behind air yards: 1 targets (4%), 1 caught (100%), 9 yds, 9.0 per target1100% · 9yRight, 0–4 air yards: 4 targets (17%), 2 caught (50%), 8 yds, 2.0 per target450% · 8yRight, 5–9 air yards: 3 targets (13%), 3 caught (100%), 13 yds, 4.3 per target3100% · 13yRight, 10–14 air yards: noneRight, 15–19 air yards: 1 targets (4%), 1 caught (100%), 16 yds, 16.0 per target1100% · 16yRight, 20–29 air yards: noneRight, 30+ air yards: none
fewer more targets
Direction and air yards come from the play-by-play (left / middle / right thirds of the field), so each glow sits in its zone rather than on an exact spot. Hover a zone for detail.

Career

2 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play

SeasonTeamGSnapsRecRec ydsRec TDTgt share
2026 so farSacramento State#138 · 1-6555%15122013.4%
2022Colorado State#125 · 3-9213%33614.6%

Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Jordan Williams's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.

Game Log

Jordan Williams's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game

6.3 avg. game scoreBest: 7.3 vs Massachusetts (Week 4)0 of 5 games at 8.0+
Receiving
WkOpponentResultGame scoreRecYdsY/RTDLong
1@Eastern MichiganL 17–285.93175.707
1Mississippi Valley StateW 52–05.52136.508
2@Fresno StateL 3–495.5294.506
3North Dakota StateL 10–317.134214.0022
4MassachusettsL 6–357.35418.2019
6@Bowling GreenL 10–38—no stats recorded
7OhioL 7–48—no stats recorded
2026 · 5 games6.3151228.1022

2026 Season Stats

FBS rank among qualifying players

Receiving2026FBS rank
Receptions15356th / 1995
Yards122558th / 1981
Yards / catch8.1420th / 461
Touchdowns0—
Long22—
Defense2026FBS rank
Tackles14244th / 5408
Solo1—
Tackles for loss0—
Sacks0—
QB hurries0—
Passes defended0—
Defensive TD0—

Snaps by Game

Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works

GameStartTeam playsEst. snapsPlays involvedPenaltiesSnap share
Wk 1 · Eastern Michigan✓ TE63~46 (39–56)5173%
Wk 1 · Mississippi Valley State✓ TE71~51 (43–62)3·72%
Wk 2 · Fresno State✓ TE66~48 (41–58)4·73%
Wk 3 · North Dakota State✓ TE66~50 (42–60)5·76%
Wk 4 · Massachusetts—77~58 (49–70)6·75%
Season4 GS458253 (214–306)23155%

Position Room

7 TEs on the Sacramento State roster, ordered by rec

#PlayerPosClassRecYdsTDTgt shareEPA/play
Jordan WilliamsTE15122012%-0.06
82Kyle KoontzTESO64005%-0.06
85Elijah HuddleTESO1902%+0.65
84Jahlil LindseyTEFR—————
86Jack HodgeTEFR—————
87Luke MeekerTEFR—————
88Cedric AntonTEJR———3%-0.47

Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Sacramento State depth chart →