Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Defense | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Havoc plays | 1 | 1746th / 2573 |
| Tackles for loss | 1 | 1082nd / 1909 |
| Run stops | 5 | 1336th / 3262 |
| Sacks | 1 | — |
| Pass breakups | 0 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Forced fumbles | 0 | — |
| Tackles | 10 | — |
3 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD | Havoc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far | Ohio#88 · 5-2 | 7 | 44% | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | Ohio#68 · 9-4 | 11 | 39% | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | Ohio#45 · 11-3 | 1 | 2% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Nathan Hale's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Nathan Hale's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Defense | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 | @ | L 21–49 | 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2 | W 29–27 | 3.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · | |
| 3 | @ | L 36–41 | 5.9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 4 | W 35–7 | 7.6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | · | · | |
| 5 | @ | W 13–10 | 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 6 | W 31–14 | 3.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · | |
| 7 | @ | W 48–7 | 6.3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2026 · 7 games | 5.0 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | · | · | ||
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 11 | 1876th / 5406 |
| Solo | 7 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 2 | 759th / 2447 |
| Sacks | 1 | 489th / 1212 |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Opp. plays | Est. snaps | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Nebraska | 74 | ~29 (11–46) | 1 | 39% |
| Wk 2 · Jacksonville State | 72 | ~28 (11–44) | 1 | 39% |
| Wk 3 · South Alabama | 70 | ~37 (14–58) | 3 | 53% |
| Wk 4 · Stonehill | 38 | ~22 (9–35) | 3 | 58% |
| Wk 5 · Kent State | 65 | ~28 (11–44) | 1 | 43% |
| Wk 6 · Central Michigan | 56 | ~26 (10–41) | 1 | 46% |
| Wk 7 · Sacramento State | 52 | ~18 (7–28) | 1 | 35% |
| Season | 427 | 188 (120–242) | 11 | 44% |
15 DLs on the Ohio roster, ordered by tkl
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | Ike Ackerman | DE | FR | 20 | 5 | 4.5 | — | 1 |
| 9 | Tyler Gillison | DL | SR | 15 | 4 | 1 | — | 3 |
| 0 | Nehemiah Dukes | DL | SR | 13 | 1 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 57 | Nathan Hale | DT | SR | 11 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 |
| 11 | Evan Herrmann | DL | JR | 10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 98 | Derek Reagans | DT | SR | 9 | 2 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 51 | Isaiah Street | DL | SR | 8 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 |
| 99 | Ty Neubert | DL | FR | 7 | 2.5 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 50 | Owen DiFranco | DE | JR | 5 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 23 | Joseph Marsh | DE | JR | 4 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 92 | RJ Keuchler | DT | JR | 4 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 10 | Drayden Pavey | DT | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 34 | Troy Stiggers | DE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | Austin Adkins | DT | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 96 | Tyler Stearman | DE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes —+ plays per team game. Ohio depth chart →