Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Defense | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Havoc plays | 2 | 1186th / 2575 |
| Tackles for loss | 2 | 628th / 1913 |
| Run stops | 17 | 152nd / 3263 |
| Sacks | 1 | — |
| Pass breakups | 0 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Forced fumbles | 0 | — |
| Tackles | 34 | — |
Charting
Where Perez's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
The play-by-play names the defender on breakups, interceptions and tackles, but not the man in coverage on every throw, so true times-targeted isn't in the text. Coverage plays is the closest stand-in; exact targets come from hand charting.
Career
2 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD | Havoc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Wyoming#123 · 4-3 | 7 | 71% | 37 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | Wyoming#114 · 4-8 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Steven Perez's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Steven Perez's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Defense | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 | @ Colorado State | L 13–35 | 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2 |  Northern Colorado | W 21–13 | 7.4 | 6 | 3 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 3 | @ Central Michigan | L 10–24 | 5.8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 4 |  Hawai'i | W 27–10 | 6.8 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 5 | @ North Dakota State | L 0–28 | 8.9 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 6 | @ San José State | W 16–13 | 6.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 7 |  Northern Illinois | W 41–23 | 6.9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2026 · 7 games | 6.6 | 37 | 18 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 37 | 258th / 5410 |
| Solo | 18 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 5.5 | 103rd / 2452 |
| Sacks | 1.5 | 382nd / 1213 |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 0 | — |
| Lost | 0 | — |
| Recovered | 1 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Opp. plays | Est. snaps | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Colorado State | 67 | ~19 (2–34) | 2 | 28% |
| Wk 2 · Northern Colorado | 62 | ~51 (26–60) | 6 | 82% |
| Wk 3 · Central Michigan | 65 | ~43 (22–51) | 6 | 66% |
| Wk 4 · Hawai'i | 67 | ~62 (31–67) | 5 | 93% |
| Wk 5 · North Dakota State | 70 | ~69 (35–70) | 10 | 99% |
| Wk 6 · San José State | 66 | ~57 (29–66) | 3 | 86% |
| Wk 7 · Northern Illinois | 73 | ~33 (3–60) | 4 | 45% |
| Season | 470 | 334 (280–401) | 36 | 71% |
Position Room
8 LBs on the Wyoming roster, ordered by tkl
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42 | Ethan Stuhlsatz | LB | SR | 48 | 1.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 |
| 26 | Gary Rutherford | LB | SO | 40 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 |
| 34 | Steven Perez | LB | FR | 37 | 5.5 | 1.5 | — | 0 |
| 46 | Dash Bauman | LB | SO | 14 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 33 | Parker Moore | LB | FR | 6 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 16 | Karson Butts | LB | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | Boston Gable | LB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | Dante Bruley | LB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes —+ plays per team game. Wyoming depth chart →