Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 14 | — |
| Target share | 11.8% | — |
| Catch rate | 78.6% | — |
| Success rate per target | 78.6% | — |
| Yards per target | 13.4 | — |
| Explosive catches | 21.4% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 7.1% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 3 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
Charting
Where Honig's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted14 targets charted
2025 charting · UConn
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (4 of Honig’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted8 targets charted
Career
4 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Northwestern#26 · 5-1 | 6 | 52% | 11 | 187 | 2 | 11.8% |
| 2025 |  UConn#75 · 9-4 | 9 | 36% | 13 | 162 | 3 | 5.7% |
| 2024 | UConn#77 · 9-4 | 3 | 12% | 6 | 59 | 3 | 6.1% |
| 2023 | UConn#118 · 3-9 | 1 | 2% | — | — | — | — |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Alex Honig's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Alex Honig's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  South Dakota State | W 34–18 | 7.2 | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 1 | 14 |
| 3 |  Colorado | W 41–7 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 4 | @ Indiana | L 23–29 | 7.6 | 3 | 54 | 18.0 | 0 | 21 |
| 5 |  Penn State | W 34–13 | 5.8 | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 0 | 13 |
| 6 |  Ball State | W 45–14 | 7.9 | 2 | 48 | 24.0 | 1 | 32 |
| 7 | @ Michigan State | W 24–21 | 6.8 | 2 | 42 | 21.0 | 0 | 23 |
| 2026 · 5 games | 7.1 | 11 | 187 | 17.0 | 2 | 32 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Passing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Completions | 0 | — |
| Attempts | 1 | — |
| Completion % | 0.0% | — |
| Yards | 0 | — |
| Yards / att. | 0 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 11 | 522nd / 1995 |
| Yards | 187 | 385th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 17 | — |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 172nd / 825 |
| Long | 32 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · South Dakota State | ✓ TE | 54 | ~28 (13–40) | 3 | 52% |
| Wk 3 · Colorado | ✓ TE | 73 | · | · | — |
| Wk 4 · Indiana | ✓ TE | 56 | ~28 (13–40) | 3 | 50% |
| Wk 5 · Penn State | ✓ TE | 69 | ~40 (34–48) | 2 | 58% |
| Wk 6 · Ball State | — | 55 | ~43 (36–52) | 3 | 78% |
| Wk 7 · Michigan State | ✓ TE | 71 | ~56 (47–68) | 4 | 79% |
| Season | 5 GS | 378 | 195 (135–262) | 15 | 52% |
Position Room
6 TEs on the Northwestern roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84 | Luke Dehnicke | TE | SO | 11 | 208 | 0 | 16% | +1.03 |
| 86 | Alex Honig | TE | SR | 11 | 187 | 2 | 11% | +0.93 |
| 43 | Noah LaPorte | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 48 | Tyler Kielmeyer | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Chris Petrucci | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Tom McGlinchey | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Northwestern depth chart →