Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 49 | — |
| Success rate | 38.8% | 257th / 321 |
| Explosive run rate | 12.2% | 189th / 321 |
| Stuffed at the line | 28.6% | 307th / 321 |
| First downs | 12 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 6 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 1 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 6 | — |
| Target share | 6.5% | — |
| Catch rate | 83.3% | — |
| Success rate per target | 33.3% | — |
| Yards per target | 4.8 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 3 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Jr.'s plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted6 targets charted
Run direction51 carries
Career
5 seasons at 4 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Duke#50 · 4-2 | 6 | 27% | 51 | 246 | 4.8 | 0 | 38.8% | 5 | 29 | 0 | 6.5% |
| 2025 |  Rutgers#65 · 5-7 | 3 | 8% | 22 | 119 | 5.4 | 0 | 56.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 |  Florida Atlantic#117 · 3-9 | 12 | 56% | 165 | 844 | 5.1 | 11 | 36.1% | 40 | 466 | 3 | 13.2% |
| 2023 |  Florida State#10 · 13-1 | 4 | 4% | 7 | 117 | 16.7 | 1 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | Florida State#12 · 10-3 | 4 | 6% | 18 | 64 | 3.6 | 2 | — | 1 | 3 | 0 | — |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. CJ Campbell Jr.'s team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
CJ Campbell Jr.'s box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Tulane | W 17–3 | 5.6 | 10 | 25 | 2.5 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 0 | 12 |
| 2 | @ Illinois | W 31–27 | 4.4 | 8 | 31 | 3.9 | 0 | 14 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 3 |  Stanford | W 35–7 | 5.3 | 9 | 42 | 4.7 | 0 | 14 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 4 |  William & Mary | W 62–7 | 5.2 | 9 | 41 | 4.6 | 0 | 9 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 6 | @ Georgia Tech | L 25–28 | 6.2 | 6 | 46 | 7.7 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 | 7 |
| 7 |  North Carolina | L 20–24 | 5.7 | 9 | 61 | 6.8 | 0 | 33 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2026 · 6 games | 5.4 | 51 | 246 | 4.8 | 0 | 33 | 5 | 29 | 5.8 | 0 | 12 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 51 | — |
| Yards | 246 | 216th / 1456 |
| Yards / carry | 4.8 | 153rd / 325 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 33 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 5 | 985th / 1995 |
| Yards | 29 | 1280th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 5.8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 12 | — |
| Kick returns | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Returns | 3 | — |
| Yards | 52 | — |
| Average | 17.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 18 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Special teams | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Tulane | — | 76 | ~23 (16–30) | 13 | · | 30% |
| Wk 2 · Illinois | — | 56 | ~14 (4–27) | 8 | 1 | 25% |
| Wk 3 · Stanford | — | 71 | ~19 (13–25) | 10 | · | 27% |
| Wk 4 · William & Mary | ✓ RB | 71 | ~21 (14–27) | 9 | · | 30% |
| Wk 6 · Georgia Tech | — | 76 | ~18 (12–23) | 8 | · | 24% |
| Wk 7 · North Carolina | — | 71 | ~20 (14–26) | 9 | 2 | 28% |
| Season | 1 GS | 421 | 115 (91–142) | 57 | 3 | 27% |
Position Room
7 RBs on the Duke roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | Nate Sheppard | RB | SO | 138 | 820 | 5.9 | 8 | 28 | +0.37 |
| 0 | CJ Campbell Jr. | RB | SR | 51 | 246 | 4.8 | 0 | 5 | -0.13 |
| 22 | Jayvian Tanelus | RB | FR | 16 | 90 | 5.6 | 2 | — | +0.34 |
| 24 | Wilhelm Daal II | RB | SR | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 0 | — | -0.38 |
| 26 | CJ Givers | RB | FR | 3 | 36 | 12 | 1 | — | +1.21 |
| 28 | Cole Denson | RB | SO | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 83 | Paul Holyfield Jr. | RB | SR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Duke depth chart →