Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS QB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Passing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Dropbacks | 58 | — |
| Success rate | 36.2% | 145th / 170 |
| Explosive pass rate | 3.6% | 167th / 170 |
| Deep-throw rate | 14.3% | 63rd / 170 |
| Sack rate | 3.4% | 49th / 170 |
| Interception rate | 3.6% | — |
| 3rd-down conversion | 31.2% | 125th / 170 |
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 6 | — |
| Success rate | 16.7% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 0.0% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 0.0% | — |
| First downs | 0 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 0 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 0 | — |
Charting
Where Geriner's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he throws67 throws charted
Career
5 seasons at 3 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Cmp/Att | Pass yds | TD–INT | Y/A | Dropback SR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Pittsburgh#42 · 5-2 | 4 | 28% | 46/70 | 438 | 2–2 | 6.3 | 36.2% |
| 2025 |  Texas State#62 · 7-6 | 1 | 0% | 0/1 | 0 | 0–0 | 0.0 | — |
| 2024 |  Auburn#48 · 5-7 | 2 | 1% | 2/2 | 33 | 0–0 | 16.5 | — |
| 2023 | Auburn#53 · 6-7 | 4 | 4% | 5/15 | 75 | 0–1 | 5.0 | 12.5% |
| 2022 | Auburn#66 · 5-7 | 1 | 1% | 2/3 | 8 | 0–0 | 2.7 | 25.0% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Holden Geriner's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Holden Geriner's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Passing | Rushing | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Cmp | Att | Pct | Yds | Y/A | TD | INT | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Miami (OH) | W 59–14 | — | 3 | 3 | 100.0 | 27 | 9.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 |
| 2 |  UCF | W 12–7 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||||||
| 3 |  Syracuse | W 27–13 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||||||
| 4 |  Bucknell | W 59–0 | 6.4 | 8 | 11 | 72.7 | 114 | 10.4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | 12 |
| 5 | @ Virginia Tech | W 35–33 | 5.7 | 8 | 12 | 66.7 | 78 | 6.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 |
| 6 |  North Carolina | L 17–21 | 2.8 | 27 | 44 | 61.4 | 219 | 5.0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | -1 | -0.1 | 0 | 3 |
| 7 | @ Boston College | L 21–27 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||||||
| 2026 · 4 games | 5.0 | 46 | 70 | 65.7 | 438 | 6.3 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 22 | 2.0 | 0 | 12 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Passing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Completions | 46 | — |
| Attempts | 70 | — |
| Completion % | 65.7% | — |
| Yards | 438 | 154th / 265 |
| Yards / att. | 6.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 165th / 265 |
| Interceptions | 2 | — |
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 11 | — |
| Yards | 22 | 839th / 1456 |
| Yards / carry | 2 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 12 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps: every offensive play credited to the QB running the offense. Close to a true snap count
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Miami (OH) | 75 | 7 | 4 | 9% |
| Wk 4 · Bucknell | 82 | 23 | 13 | 28% |
| Wk 5 · Virginia Tech | 61 | 22 | 13 | 36% |
| Wk 6 · North Carolina | 85 | 85 | 51 | 100% |
| Season | 498 | 137 | 81 | 28% |
Position Room
6 QBs on the Pittsburgh roster, ordered by att
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Att | Yds | TD | INT | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Mason Heintschel | QB | SO | 148 | 1304 | 14 | 1 | +0.42 |
| 15 | Holden Geriner | QB | SR | 70 | 438 | 2 | 2 | -0.01 |
| 16 | Corey Dailey | QB | FR | 30 | 250 | 2 | 2 | +0.21 |
| 8 | Angelo Renda | QB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | Beau Jackson | QB | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | Davin Friedman | QB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 12+ plays per team game. Pittsburgh depth chart →