Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Defense | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Havoc plays | 2 | 1191st / 2577 |
| Tackles for loss | 2 | 630th / 1914 |
| Run stops | 6 | 1156th / 3269 |
| Sacks | 1 | — |
| Pass breakups | 0 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Forced fumbles | 0 | — |
| Tackles | 25 | — |
Charting
Where Bernard's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
The play-by-play names the defender on breakups, interceptions and tackles, but not the man in coverage on every throw, so true times-targeted isn't in the text. Coverage plays is the closest stand-in; exact targets come from hand charting.
Game Log
Jeremiah Bernard's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Defense | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 | @ Washington | L 10–24 | 5.6 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2 | @ Kansas State | L 7–34 | 2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 3 |  Duquesne | W 48–7 | 6.5 | 6 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 4 |  Arizona | L 24–34 | 5.9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 5 |  Fresno State | L 6–26 | 5.9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 6 | @ Utah State | L 16–17 | 5.0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 7 | @ Oregon State | L 30–48 | 6.0 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2026 · 7 games | 5.3 | 26 | 16 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 26 | 611th / 5416 |
| Solo | 16 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 1.5 | 1058th / 2453 |
| Sacks | 0.5 | 980th / 1213 |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Opp. plays | Est. snaps | Plays made | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Washington | ✓ S | 63 | ~62 (25–63) | 4 | · | 98% |
| Wk 2 · Kansas State | ✓ S | 74 | ~7 (0–22) | 1 | · | 9% |
| Wk 3 · Duquesne | ✓ S | 52 | ~52 (21–52) | 6 | · | 100% |
| Wk 4 · Arizona | ✓ S | 74 | ~50 (20–53) | 2 | 1 | 68% |
| Wk 5 · Fresno State | ✓ S | 68 | ~64 (26–68) | 5 | · | 94% |
| Wk 6 · Utah State | ✓ S | 58 | ~20 (0–33) | 2 | · | 34% |
| Wk 7 · Oregon State | — | 71 | ~69 (28–71) | 6 | · | 97% |
| Season | 6 GS | 460 | 324 (246–360) | 26 | 1 | 70% |
Position Room
19 DBs on the Washington State roster, ordered by tkl
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Jaylen Thomas | S | SO | 30 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 1 | Jeremiah Bernard | S | JR | 26 | 1.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 |
| 13 | Khamari Terrell | CB | SR | 26 | 2.5 | 0 | — | 3 |
| 2 | Jamarey Smith | CB | FR | 25 | 0 | 0 | — | 4 |
| 25 | Jackquintin Bal | S | JR | 23 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 0 | CJ Solis-Lumar | CB | SO | 13 | 1 | 0 | — | 2 |
| 22 | Jalil Tucker | CB | SR | 11 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Kai Rapolla | CB | SR | 9 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 19 | Kayo Patu | CB | SO | 7 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 31 | Trey Ridley | S | SO | 7 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 28 | Kyle Peterson | S | SO | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 17 | Jshawn Frausto-Ramos | S | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | Gaylon McNeal | S | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | Ishmael Gibbs | CB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | Elmo Wartson | CB | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | Chris Perry Jr. | S | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | Bryson Flynn | S | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | Nick Norrah | CB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | Kenny Miller-Terry | S | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes —+ plays per team game. Washington State depth chart →