Snap share
28%
likely 18–36%
Tackles
12
1755th of 5416 in FBS
Solo
2
Tackles for loss
3
422nd of 2453 in FBS
Sacks
1
491st of 1213 in FBS
Interceptions
0
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Defense | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Havoc plays | 3 | 811th / 2577 |
| Tackles for loss | 3 | 380th / 1914 |
| Run stops | 9 | 665th / 3269 |
| Sacks | 1 | — |
| Pass breakups | 0 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Forced fumbles | 0 | — |
| Tackles | 11 | — |
Game Log
Joseph Oluwayemi's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
5.7 avg. game scoreBest: 7.4 vs Sacramento State (Week 1)0 of 6 games at 8.0+
| Defense | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 |  Sacramento State | W 28–17 | 7.4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | · | · |
| 1 |  San José State | L 21–27 | 3.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2 | @ Michigan State | L 7–35 | 5.9 | 2 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 3 | @ Wisconsin | L 10–54 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||
| 4 |  Lindenwood | W 29–3 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||
| 5 | @ Massachusetts | W 38–14 | 7.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 6 | @ Akron | W 25–23 | 5.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 7 |  Toledo | L 14–34 | 5.5 | 1 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2026 · 6 games | 5.7 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 12 | 1755th / 5416 |
| Solo | 2 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 3 | 422nd / 2453 |
| Sacks | 1 | 491st / 1213 |
| QB hurries | 1 | 636th / 1387 |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Opp. plays | Est. snaps | Plays made | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Sacramento State | 63 | ~18 (7–28) | 1 | · | 29% |
| Wk 1 · San José State | 76 | ~16 (6–25) | 1 | · | 21% |
| Wk 2 · Michigan State | 71 | ~30 (12–47) | 2 | · | 42% |
| Wk 5 · Massachusetts | 52 | ~34 (13–52) | 5 | 1 | 65% |
| Wk 6 · Akron | 58 | ~24 (9–38) | 2 | · | 41% |
| Wk 7 · Toledo | 70 | ~18 (7–28) | 1 | · | 26% |
| Season | 505 | 140 (89–180) | 12 | 1 | 28% |
Position Room
22 DLs on the Eastern Michigan roster, ordered by tkl
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54 | Quincy Byas | DL | SO | 24 | 6.5 | 4.5 | — | 2 |
| 88 | Ronn Hardin | DL | SR | 20 | 3 | 1.5 | — | 2 |
| 58 | Peyton Christian | DL | SR | 17 | 2 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 33 | Carter Evans | DL | SR | 13 | 0.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 |
| 98 | Joseph Oluwayemi | DL | SR | 12 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 |
| 5 | Makhi Gilbert | DL | SR | 10 | 1 | 0.5 | — | 1 |
| 43 | Marvell Eggleston | DL | JR | 10 | 1 | 0 | — | 1 |
| Warren-Stevens Tayou | DL | 10 | 1 | 0.5 | — | 1 | ||
| 90 | Hector Gonzalez | DL | SO | 9 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Javon Thomas | DL | 4 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | ||
| 64 | Noah Patterson | DL | JR | 3 | 1 | 0.5 | — | 0 |
| 91 | Reggie Gardner | DL | JR | 3 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 44 | Mark Debiak | DL | JR | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 |
| 53 | Alijah Lacey | DL | SR | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 56 | RJ Alphonse | DL | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 94 | Brandon Simmons Jr. | DL | FR | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | — | 0 |
| 50 | CJ McCoy | DL | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Jefferson Adam | DL | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 93 | Owen Edlen | DL | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 95 | Milan Colvin | DL | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 96 | Antoniyo Smith | DL | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 97 | Jahbarri Frost | DL | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes —+ plays per team game. Eastern Michigan depth chart →