Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 8 | — |
| Target share | 6.4% | — |
| Catch rate | 87.5% | — |
| Success rate per target | 50.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 5.5 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 4 | — |
Charting
Where Mosley's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted8 targets charted
The play-by-play names the defender on breakups, interceptions and tackles, but not the man in coverage on every throw, so true times-targeted isn't in the text. Coverage plays is the closest stand-in; exact targets come from hand charting.
Game Log
KD Mosley's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Liberty | W 20–13 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 |  Wagner | W 87–3 | 6.9 | 1 | 20 | 20.0 | 1 | 20 |
| 3 | @ San Diego State | W 26–13 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 4 | @ Old Dominion | W 46–20 | 5.4 | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 0 | 11 |
| 5 |  Marshall | W 45–17 | 5.3 | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 0 | 6 |
| 6 | @ Georgia Southern | W 27–24 | 5.9 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 |
| 7 |  Georgia State | W 49–22 | 6.9 | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 1 | 19 |
| 2026 · 5 games | 6.1 | 8 | 64 | 8.0 | 3 | 20 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 8 | 694th / 1994 |
| Yards | 64 | 910th / 1980 |
| Yards / catch | 8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 93rd / 824 |
| Long | 20 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 2 · Wagner | 62 | ~24 (11–34) | 1 | 39% |
| Wk 4 · Old Dominion | 79 | ~32 (15–46) | 2 | 41% |
| Wk 5 · Marshall | 66 | ~33 (15–47) | 3 | 50% |
| Wk 6 · Georgia Southern | 77 | ~23 (11–33) | 1 | 30% |
| Wk 7 · Georgia State | 68 | ~29 (13–41) | 2 | 43% |
| Season | 475 | 141 (97–190) | 9 | 30% |
Position Room
8 TEs on the James Madison roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Cole Keller | TE | SR | 18 | 315 | 4 | 10% | +1.52 |
| 13 | KD Mosley | TE | JR | 8 | 64 | 3 | 6% | +1.03 |
| 82 | Thatcher Miller | TE | SR | 1 | 11 | 0 | 4% | +1.01 |
| 85 | Ryder Post | TE | JR | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4% | -0.16 |
| 44 | Max Roche | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Brian Hnat | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 86 | Ethan Gurela | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Thomas Guillemette | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. James Madison depth chart →