Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 5 | — |
| Target share | 7.7% | — |
| Catch rate | 60.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 20.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 4.0 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
Charting
Where Kurisky's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted6 targets charted
2025 charting · Louisville
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (6 of Kurisky’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted12 targets charted
Career
4 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Duke#49 · 4-2 | 5 | 19% | 5 | 38 | 0 | 7.7% |
| 2025 |  Louisville#24 · 9-4 | 10 | 44% | 20 | 157 | 2 | 9.1% |
| 2024 | Louisville#14 · 9-4 | 7 | 25% | 12 | 112 | 3 | 6.7% |
| 2023 | Louisville#23 · 10-4 | 9 | 39% | 18 | 141 | 2 | 7.0% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Nate Kurisky's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Nate Kurisky's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
William & Mary
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 5 | 991st / 1995 |
| Yards | 38 | 1165th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 7.6 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 15 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 2 · Illinois | — | 56 | ~15 (7–21) | 1 | · | 27% |
| Wk 3 · Stanford | ✓ TE | 71 | · | · | · | — |
| Wk 4 · William & Mary | — | 71 | ~30 (14–43) | 3 | · | 42% |
| Wk 6 · Georgia Tech | — | 76 | ~33 (15–47) | 3 | · | 43% |
| Wk 7 · North Carolina | — | 71 | · | · | 1 | — |
| Season | 1 GS | 421 | 78 (43–104) | 7 | 1 | 19% |
Position Room
7 TEs on the Duke roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 | Jeremiah Hasley | TE | SR | 21 | 250 | 0 | 20% | +0.42 |
| 44 | Nate Kurisky | TE | SR | 5 | 38 | 0 | 8% | +0.42 |
| 15 | Jake Taylor | TE | SR | 4 | 33 | 0 | 8% | -0.88 |
| 46 | Tony Boggs | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Benjamin Moseley | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Brett Elliott | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Jack Gaskins | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Duke depth chart →