Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS QB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Passing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Dropbacks | 272 | — |
| Success rate | 37.9% | 134th / 171 |
| Explosive pass rate | 7.5% | 140th / 171 |
| Deep-throw rate | 13.2% | 85th / 171 |
| Sack rate | 2.2% | 25th / 171 |
| Interception rate | 1.5% | — |
| 3rd-down conversion | 36.8% | 76th / 171 |
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 22 | — |
| Success rate | 31.8% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 9.1% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 31.8% | — |
| First downs | 5 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 5 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 4 | — |
Charting
Where Kim's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he throws276 throws charted
Run direction20 carries
2025 charting · Eastern Michigan
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (4 of Kim’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he throws129 throws charted
Run direction20 carries
Career
5 seasons at 3 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Cmp/Att | Pass yds | TD–INT | Y/A | Dropback SR | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Eastern Michigan#124 · 4-4 | 8 | 95% | 169/285 | 1678 | 11–4 | 5.9 | 37.9% | 29 | -23 | -0.8 | 3 | 31.8% |
| 2025 | Eastern Michigan#117 · 4-8 | 12 | 100% | 247/402 | 2817 | 18–11 | 7.0 | 39.3% | 79 | 186 | 2.4 | 6 | 38.3% |
| 2024 |  Coastal Carolina#101 · 6-7 | 7 | 12% | 30/56 | 333 | 4–1 | 5.9 | 32.5% | 13 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 50.0% |
| 2023 |  Michigan State#95 · 4-8 | 5 | 40% | 91/160 | 1090 | 6–6 | 6.8 | 39.2% | 27 | 53 | 2.0 | 0 | 47.6% |
| 2022 | Michigan State#68 · 5-7 | 3 | 4% | 14/19 | 174 | 3–0 | 9.2 | 100.0% | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | — |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Noah Kim's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Noah Kim's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Passing | Rushing | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Cmp | Att | Pct | Yds | Y/A | TD | INT | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Sacramento State | W 28–17 | 6.3 | 27 | 38 | 71.1 | 279 | 7.3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -13 | -2.2 | 1 | 5 |
| 1 |  San José State | L 21–27 | 3.9 | 24 | 43 | 55.8 | 174 | 4.0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 3.3 | 0 | 7 |
| 2 | @Michigan State | L 7–35 | 5.0 | 16 | 26 | 61.5 | 118 | 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0.3 | 1 | 11 |
| 3 | @ Wisconsin | L 10–54 | 2.5 | 16 | 28 | 57.1 | 140 | 5.0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -16 | -16.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 |  Lindenwood | W 29–3 | 6.5 | 23 | 38 | 60.5 | 257 | 6.8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -3 | -1.5 | 0 | 2 |
| 5 | @ Massachusetts | W 38–14 | 6.7 | 21 | 30 | 70.0 | 219 | 7.3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 3.2 | 0 | 8 |
| 6 | @ Akron | W 25–23 | 5.7 | 26 | 46 | 56.5 | 277 | 6.0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0.3 | 1 | 5 |
| 7 |  Toledo | L 14–34 | 5.3 | 16 | 36 | 44.4 | 214 | 5.9 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -20 | -10.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 · 8 games | 5.2 | 169 | 285 | 59.3 | 1678 | 5.9 | 11 | 4 | 29 | -23 | -0.8 | 3 | 11 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Passing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Completions | 169 | — |
| Attempts | 285 | — |
| Completion % | 59.3% | 110th / 143 |
| Yards | 1678 | 23rd / 265 |
| Yards / att. | 5.9 | 135th / 143 |
| Touchdowns | 11 | 41st / 265 |
| Interceptions | 4 | — |
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 29 | — |
| Yards | -23 | 1440th / 1458 |
| Yards / carry | -0.8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 151st / 633 |
| Long | 11 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 3 | — |
| Lost | 3 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps: every offensive play credited to the QB running the offense. Close to a true snap count
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Sacramento State | ✓ QB | 68 | 68 | 46 | 100% |
| Wk 1 · San José State | ✓ QB | 68 | 68 | 46 | 100% |
| Wk 2 · Michigan State | ✓ QB | 52 | 52 | 33 | 100% |
| Wk 3 · Wisconsin | ✓ QB | 60 | 52 | 29 | 87% |
| Wk 4 · Lindenwood | ✓ QB | 69 | 69 | 40 | 100% |
| Wk 5 · Massachusetts | ✓ QB | 68 | 68 | 35 | 100% |
| Wk 6 · Akron | — | 78 | 78 | 49 | 100% |
| Wk 7 · Toledo | ✓ QB | 71 | 53 | 38 | 75% |
| Season | 7 GS | 534 | 508 | 316 | 95% |
Position Room
5 QBs on the Eastern Michigan roster, ordered by att
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Att | Yds | TD | INT | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Noah Kim | QB | SR | 285 | 1678 | 11 | 4 | +0.11 |
| 12 | Jace Stuckey | QB | JR | 5 | 24 | 0 | 0 | -1.04 |
| 10 | Brogan McCaughey | QB | SR | 4 | 18 | 0 | 0 | +0.27 |
| 13 | Nick Kinsey | QB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | Bryce Button | QB | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 12+ plays per team game. Eastern Michigan depth chart →