Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 61 | — |
| Success rate | 45.9% | 158th / 321 |
| Explosive run rate | 9.8% | 245th / 321 |
| Stuffed at the line | 11.5% | 91st / 321 |
| First downs | 16 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 16 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 5 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 9 | — |
| Target share | 5.5% | — |
| Catch rate | 88.9% | — |
| Success rate per target | 22.2% | — |
| Yards per target | 11.4 | — |
| Explosive catches | 11.1% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 11.1% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Williams's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted9 targets charted
Run direction70 carries
2025 charting · Notre Dame
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025, so treat the maps as a sample.
Run direction17 carries
Career
3 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Notre Dame#1 · 6-1 | 7 | 32% | 70 | 302 | 4.3 | 4 | 45.9% | 9 | 109 | 1 | 5.5% |
| 2025 | Notre Dame#3 · 10-2 | 6 | 9% | 24 | 224 | 9.3 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 40 | 0 | 4.8% |
| 2024 | Notre Dame#2 · 14-2 | 13 | 16% | 34 | 219 | 6.4 | 2 | 42.1% | 18 | 172 | 0 | 9.3% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Aneyas Williams's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Aneyas Williams's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | vs Wisconsin | W 41–13 | 7.4 | 20 | 90 | 4.5 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 11 |
| 2 |  Rice | W 52–0 | 4.2 | 9 | 29 | 3.2 | 0 | 7 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 3 |  Michigan State | W 27–10 | 6.0 | 9 | 25 | 2.8 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 0 | 7 |
| 4 | @ Purdue | W 49–10 | 6.9 | 14 | 80 | 5.7 | 1 | 22 | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | 6 |
| 5 | @ North Carolina | W 37–26 | 5.9 | 8 | 42 | 5.3 | 0 | 24 | 3 | 6 | 2.0 | 0 | 3 |
| 6 |  Stanford | W 58–7 | 7.8 | 7 | 28 | 4.0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 70 | 70.0 | 1 | 70 |
| 7 | @ BYU | L 24–28 | 4.6 | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 6.1 | 70 | 302 | 4.3 | 4 | 24 | 9 | 109 | 12.1 | 1 | 70 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 70 | — |
| Yards | 302 | 167th / 1456 |
| Yards / carry | 4.3 | 211th / 325 |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 91st / 631 |
| Long | 24 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 9 | 631st / 1995 |
| Yards | 109 | 617th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 12.1 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 346th / 825 |
| Long | 70 | — |
| Kick returns | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Returns | 2 | — |
| Yards | 42 | — |
| Average | 21 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 29 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Special teams | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Wisconsin | ✓ RB | 61 | ~39 (27–51) | 21 | 2 | · | 64% |
| Wk 2 · Rice | ✓ RB | 65 | ~20 (14–26) | 10 | · | · | 31% |
| Wk 3 · Michigan State | ✓ RB | 67 | ~19 (13–25) | 11 | · | 1 | 28% |
| Wk 4 · Purdue | — | 58 | ~28 (19–36) | 15 | · | · | 48% |
| Wk 5 · North Carolina | — | 75 | ~19 (13–25) | 11 | · | · | 25% |
| Wk 6 · Stanford | — | 75 | ~16 (11–21) | 8 | · | · | 21% |
| Wk 7 · BYU | — | 80 | ~12 (3–23) | 4 | · | · | 15% |
| Season | 3 GS | 481 | 153 (121–189) | 80 | 2 | 1 | 32% |
Position Room
6 RBs on the Notre Dame roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Nolan James Jr. | RB | SO | 81 | 412 | 5.1 | 6 | 13 | +0.30 |
| Aneyas Williams | RB | 70 | 302 | 4.3 | 4 | 9 | +0.26 | ||
| Jonaz Walton | RB | 57 | 426 | 7.5 | 3 | 4 | +0.36 | ||
| 26 | Javian Osborne | RB | FR | 11 | 35 | 3.2 | 1 | — | +0.01 |
| Kedren Young | RB | 10 | 29 | 2.9 | 0 | 2 | +0.12 | ||
| 37 | Kurt Smith | RB | SO | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Notre Dame depth chart →