Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Defense | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Havoc plays | 8 | 55th / 2577 |
| Tackles for loss | 6 | 66th / 1914 |
| Run stops | 26 | 26th / 3270 |
| Sacks | 2 | — |
| Pass breakups | 2 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Forced fumbles | 0 | — |
| Tackles | 52 | — |
Where Palano's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
The play-by-play names the defender on breakups, interceptions and tackles, but not the man in coverage on every throw, so true times-targeted isn't in the text. Coverage plays is the closest stand-in; exact targets come from hand charting.
2 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD | Havoc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far | Boston College#85 · 3-3 | 6 | 94% | 51 | 6.5 | 1.5 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 2025 | Washington State#50 · 7-6 | 11 | 61% | 65 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Anthony Palano's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Anthony Palano's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Defense | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 | @ | L 15–34 | 8.0 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2 | W 28–21 | 10.0 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | · | |
| 3 | W 22–16 | 8.5 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · | |
| 4 | L 14–21 | 7.7 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | · | · | |
| 5 | @ | L 16–25 | 5.4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 7 | W 27–21 | 6.9 | 8 | 3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | · | · | |
| 2026 · 6 games | 7.8 | 51 | 25 | 6.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | · | ||
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 51 | 64th / 5418 |
| Solo | 25 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 6.5 | 54th / 2453 |
| Sacks | 1.5 | 387th / 1213 |
| QB hurries | 1 | 638th / 1387 |
| Passes defended | 1 | 713th / 1596 |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
| Interceptions | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Interceptions | 2 | 28th / 531 |
| Return yards | 6 | — |
| Pick-sixes | 0 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Opp. plays | Est. snaps | Plays made | Special teams | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Cincinnati | ✓ LB | 61 | ~61 (31–61) | 13 | · | 100% |
| Wk 2 · Rutgers | ✓ LB | 68 | ~68 (35–68) | 11 | 1 | 100% |
| Wk 3 · Maine | ✓ LB | 67 | ~67 (34–67) | 12 | · | 100% |
| Wk 4 · Virginia Tech | ✓ LB | 77 | ~67 (34–77) | 7 | · | 87% |
| Wk 5 · SMU | — | 63 | ~50 (25–59) | 3 | · | 79% |
| Wk 7 · Pittsburgh | ✓ LB | 64 | ~64 (33–64) | 8 | · | 100% |
| Season | 5 GS | 400 | 377 (316–400) | 54 | 1 | 94% |
11 LBs on the Boston College roster, ordered by tkl
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthony Palano | LB | SO | 51 | 6.5 | 1.5 | 2 | 1 |
| 42 | Kemori Dixon | LB | SO | 15 | 2.5 | 1 | — | 0 |
| Zacari Thomas | LB | 13 | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | ||
| 36 | Bodie Kahoun | LB | SO | 11 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 20 | Justin Medlock | LB | SR | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 51 | Steve Klein | LB | FR | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Juan Zubal | LB | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | ||
| 37 | Callen Beveridge | LB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | Griffin Collins | LB | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | Palaie Faoa | LB | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 50 | Sean Howard | LB | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes —+ plays per team game. Boston College depth chart →