Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 8 | — |
| Target share | 6.7% | — |
| Catch rate | 50.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 50.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 5.0 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
Charting
Where II's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted8 targets charted
Game Log
Chris Gacayan II's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Oklahoma State | W 24–10 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 | @ Sam Houston | W 23–17 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 3 |  East Texas A&M | W 42–0 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 4 | @ Arkansas | L 6–34 | 1.5 | 1 | 23 | 23.0 | 0 | 23 |
| 5 |  North Texas | L 44–45 | 6.7 | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 0 | 15 |
| 6 | @ Navy | L 26–34 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 7 | @ Rice | W 38–17 | 4.7 | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 |
| 2026 · 3 games | 4.3 | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 0 | 23 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 5 | 985th / 1995 |
| Yards | 63 | 919th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 12.6 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 23 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 1 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Oklahoma State | ✓ TE | 57 | ~33 (15–47) | 1 | 58% |
| Wk 4 · Arkansas | ✓ TE | 55 | ~30 (14–43) | 2 | 55% |
| Wk 5 · North Texas | — | 80 | ~47 (40–57) | 4 | 59% |
| Wk 7 · Rice | — | 63 | ~40 (34–48) | 2 | 63% |
| Season | 2 GS | 463 | 150 (103–202) | 9 | 32% |
Position Room
7 TEs on the Tulsa roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82 | Chris Gacayan II | TE | JR | 5 | 63 | 0 | 6% | -0.39 |
| 11 | Grant McAtee | TE | JR | 2 | 10 | 0 | 3% | -0.36 |
| 84 | Jewlyen Roberts | TE | SO | 2 | 23 | 0 | 3% | -0.94 |
| 86 | Luke Tevis | TE | FR | 1 | 16 | 0 | 3% | +0.82 |
| 87 | Jackson Shockley | TE | FR | 1 | 22 | 1 | 4% | +3.66 |
| 32 | Max Moore | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Kuba Malecki | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Tulsa depth chart →