Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 88 | — |
| Success rate | 36.4% | 277th / 320 |
| Explosive run rate | 8.0% | 274th / 320 |
| Stuffed at the line | 6.8% | 23rd / 320 |
| First downs | 22 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 18 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 7 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 25 | — |
| Target share | 11.6% | 451st / 527 |
| Catch rate | 60.0% | 346th / 527 |
| Success rate per target | 40.0% | 383rd / 527 |
| Yards per target | 4.3 | 500th / 527 |
| Explosive catches | 4.0% | 455th / 527 |
| Deep-target rate | 4.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 8 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 3 | — |
Charting
Where Alston's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted21 targets charted
Run direction90 carries
Career
5 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Tulsa#91 · 4-3 | 7 | 54% | 91 | 366 | 4.0 | 6 | 36.4% | 15 | 108 | 0 | 11.6% |
| 2025 |  Auburn#40 · 5-7 | 4 | 14% | 32 | 128 | 4.0 | 1 | 45.5% | 4 | 29 | 0 | 6.1% |
| 2024 | Auburn#48 · 5-7 | 12 | 21% | 52 | 276 | 5.3 | 3 | 46.8% | 6 | 53 | 0 | 3.2% |
| 2023 | Auburn#53 · 6-7 | 10 | 22% | 64 | 320 | 5.0 | 2 | 52.9% | 8 | 48 | 0 | 6.3% |
| 2022 | Auburn#66 · 5-7 | 10 | 7% | 14 | 85 | 6.1 | 0 | 36.4% | 1 | 13 | 0 | — |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Damari Alston's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Damari Alston's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Oklahoma State | W 24–10 | 7.0 | 15 | 73 | 4.9 | 2 | 29 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2 | @ Sam Houston | W 23–17 | 6.7 | 13 | 45 | 3.5 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 0 | 13 |
| 3 |  East Texas A&M | W 42–0 | 6.9 | 8 | 68 | 8.5 | 1 | 19 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 4 | @ Arkansas | L 6–34 | 6.3 | 9 | 27 | 3.0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 0 | 9 |
| 5 |  North Texas | L 44–45 | 6.8 | 23 | 79 | 3.4 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 0 | 11 |
| 6 | @ Navy | L 26–34 | 3.9 | 11 | 22 | 2.0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 | 5 |
| 7 | @ Rice | W 38–17 | 6.9 | 12 | 52 | 4.3 | 1 | 13 | 1 | 26 | 26.0 | 0 | 26 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 6.4 | 91 | 366 | 4.0 | 6 | 29 | 15 | 108 | 7.2 | 0 | 26 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 91 | — |
| Yards | 366 | 108th / 1458 |
| Yards / carry | 4 | 241st / 322 |
| Touchdowns | 6 | 32nd / 633 |
| Long | 29 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 15 | 361st / 1995 |
| Yards | 108 | 622nd / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 7.2 | 440th / 463 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 26 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 0 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Oklahoma State | ✓ RB | 57 | ~32 (22–41) | 16 | 56% |
| Wk 2 · Sam Houston | ✓ RB | 73 | ~44 (37–49) | 21 | 60% |
| Wk 3 · East Texas A&M | ✓ RB | 70 | ~19 (13–25) | 9 | 27% |
| Wk 4 · Arkansas | ✓ RB | 55 | ~32 (22–41) | 12 | 58% |
| Wk 5 · North Texas | ✓ RB | 80 | ~58 (49–64) | 29 | 73% |
| Wk 6 · Navy | ✓ RB | 65 | ~37 (25–48) | 15 | 57% |
| Wk 7 · Rice | ✓ RB | 63 | ~29 (20–38) | 14 | 46% |
| Season | 7 GS | 463 | 251 (199–310) | 116 | 54% |
Position Room
6 RBs on the Tulsa roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Damari Alston | RB | SR | 91 | 366 | 4 | 6 | 15 | +0.08 |
| 3 | Trequan Jones | RB | SR | 55 | 322 | 5.9 | 3 | 3 | +0.04 |
| 4 | DJ McKinney | RB | JR | 13 | 72 | 5.5 | 0 | 3 | -0.04 |
| 23 | Seth Davis | RB | JR | 9 | 90 | 10 | 1 | — | +0.53 |
| 28 | Sevion Morrison | RB | SR | 5 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 2 | +1.18 |
| 21 | Jamarcea Plater | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Tulsa depth chart →