Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 10 | — |
| Target share | 6.0% | — |
| Catch rate | 70.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 50.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 7.6 | — |
| Explosive catches | 20.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
Charting
Where Clement's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted10 targets charted
Career
2 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Syracuse#68 · 2-4 | 6 | 36% | 7 | 69 | 1 | 6.0% |
| 2025 | Syracuse#106 · 3-9 | 4 | 9% | 3 | 30 | 0 | 3.3% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. David Clement's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
David Clement's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | Defense | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 |  New Hampshire | W 66–3 | 7.8 | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 1 | 27 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2 |  California | L 18–21 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 3 | @ Pittsburgh | L 13–27 | 5.2 | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | 12 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 5 | @ UConn | W 42–41 | 6.0 | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 0 | 25 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 6 | @ Virginia | L 25–28 | 3.7 | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 9 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 7 |  Louisville | L 26–34 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 2026 · 4 games | 5.7 | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 1 | 27 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 7 | 787th / 1994 |
| Yards | 69 | 871st / 1980 |
| Yards / catch | 9.9 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 345th / 824 |
| Long | 27 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 2 | 3761st / 5406 |
| Solo | 1 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · New Hampshire | ✓ TE | 77 | ~27 (13–39) | 2 | 2 | 35% |
| Wk 2 · California | ✓ TE | 86 | · | · | · | — |
| Wk 3 · Pittsburgh | ✓ TE | 70 | ~38 (18–54) | 2 | · | 54% |
| Wk 5 · UConn | ✓ TE | 85 | ~46 (39–56) | 3 | · | 54% |
| Wk 6 · Virginia | — | 82 | ~32 (15–46) | 2 | · | 39% |
| Wk 7 · Louisville | — | 84 | ~32 (15–46) | 1 | · | 38% |
| Season | 4 GS | 484 | 175 (121–235) | 10 | 2 | 36% |
Position Room
6 TEs on the Syracuse roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | Daunte Bacheyie | TE | SO | 16 | 245 | 4 | 9% | +1.13 |
| 0 | David Clement | TE | SR | 7 | 69 | 1 | 5% | +0.23 |
| 81 | Noah Meyers | TE | JR | 6 | 73 | 1 | 5% | +0.72 |
| Elijah Washington-Baker | TE | 1 | 6 | 0 | 5% | -1.96 | ||
| 80 | Carter Bashir | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Wyatt Bowman | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Syracuse depth chart →