#86
UCLA · 2026

Jalen Saint Paul

WRJunior5' 11", 185 lbsCarlsbad, CA
UCLA Bruins6-0 · TDC #16
Snap share
22%
likely 10–29%
Receptions
6
875th of 1994 in FBS
Rec. yards
56
986th of 1980 in FBS
Yards / catch
9.3
Rec. TD
0

Advanced

Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume

ReceivingValueFBS rank
Targets9—
Target share10.1%491st / 522
Catch rate66.7%218th / 522
Success rate per target44.4%313th / 522
Yards per target6.2413th / 522
Explosive catches11.1%260th / 522
Deep-target rate22.2%—
3rd-down targets3—
Red-zone targets2—

Charting

Where Paul's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play

Targets
9
6 caught (67%)
Avg. depth of target
11.2
air yards per target
YAC per catch
4.0
24 yds after the catch
Air yards caught
32
of 56 yds on charted catches
Deep targets
22%
20+ air yards

Where he's targeted9 targets charted

67% comp11.2 avg. depth4.0 YAC/catch22% 20+ air yds0–0 TD–INT
101020203030LOSLeft, Behind air yards: 1 targets (11%), 1 caught (100%), 3 yds, 3.0 per target1100% · 3yLeft, 0–4 air yards: 1 targets (11%), 1 caught (100%), 5 yds, 5.0 per target1100% · 5yLeft, 5–9 air yards: 1 targets (11%), 1 caught (100%), 5 yds, 5.0 per target1100% · 5yLeft, 10–14 air yards: noneLeft, 15–19 air yards: noneLeft, 20–29 air yards: noneLeft, 30+ air yards: noneMiddle, Behind air yards: noneMiddle, 0–4 air yards: noneMiddle, 5–9 air yards: 1 targets (11%), 1 caught (100%), 21 yds, 21.0 per target1100% · 21yMiddle, 10–14 air yards: 1 targets (11%), 1 caught (100%), 14 yds, 14.0 per target1100% · 14yMiddle, 15–19 air yards: 1 targets (11%), 0 caught (0%), 0 yds, 0.0 per target10% · 0yMiddle, 20–29 air yards: 1 targets (11%), 0 caught (0%), 0 yds, 0.0 per target10% · 0yMiddle, 30+ air yards: noneRight, Behind air yards: noneRight, 0–4 air yards: noneRight, 5–9 air yards: noneRight, 10–14 air yards: 1 targets (11%), 1 caught (100%), 8 yds, 8.0 per target1100% · 8yRight, 15–19 air yards: noneRight, 20–29 air yards: noneRight, 30+ air yards: 1 targets (11%), 0 caught (0%), 0 yds, 0.0 per target10% · 0y
fewer more targets
Direction and air yards come from the play-by-play (left / middle / right thirds of the field), so each glow sits in its zone rather than on an exact spot. Hover a zone for detail.

Game Log

Jalen Saint Paul's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game

5.6 avg. game scoreBest: 6.4 vs Wisconsin (Week 7)0 of 2 games at 8.0+
Receiving
WkOpponentResultGame scoreRecYdsY/RTDLong
1@CaliforniaW 45–24—no stats recorded
2San Diego StateW 28–104.82115.508
3PurdueW 52–38—no stats recorded
4@MarylandW 54–3—no stats recorded
6@OregonW 17–15—no stats recorded
7WisconsinW 17–76.444511.3021
2026 · 2 games5.66569.3021

2026 Season Stats

FBS rank among qualifying players

Receiving2026FBS rank
Receptions6875th / 1994
Yards56986th / 1980
Yards / catch9.3—
Touchdowns0—
Long21—

Snaps by Game

Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works

GameTeam playsEst. snapsPlays involvedSnap share
Wk 2 · San Diego State67~36 (11–49)254%
Wk 3 · Purdue80~11 (3–18)114%
Wk 7 · Wisconsin71~43 (28–52)661%
Season40490 (42–116)922%

Position Room

14 WRs on the UCLA roster, ordered by rec

#PlayerPosClassRecYdsTDTgt shareEPA/play
4Semaj MorganWRSR24313220%+0.61
2Brian Rowe Jr.WRSO14209016%+0.27
11Landon EllisWRSR7125111%+0.40
1Aidan MizellWRSR6158110%+0.82
86Jalen Saint PaulWRJR6560——
7Mikey MatthewsWRSR488021%+1.10
Leland SmithWR47906%+1.69
12Jace BrownWRSO—————
15Marcus HarrisWRSO—————
20Shane RosenthalWRSO———4%-0.76
23Jackson MeehanWRSR—————
25Major PrideWRFR—————
26Markus KierWRFR—————
81Kenneth Moore IIIWRFR—————

Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. UCLA depth chart →