Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 8 | — |
| Target share | 6.5% | — |
| Catch rate | 50.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 37.5% | — |
| Yards per target | 2.4 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 3 | — |
Charting
Where Flanigan's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted9 targets charted
Game Log
James Flanigan's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | Defense | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 | vs Wisconsin | W 41–13 | 6.5 | 2 | 10 | 5.0 | 1 | 7 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2 |  Rice | W 52–0 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 3 |  Michigan State | W 27–10 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 4 | @ Purdue | W 49–10 | 4.9 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 5 | @ North Carolina | W 37–26 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 6 |  Stanford | W 58–7 | 3.2 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 7 | @ BYU | L 24–28 | 3.7 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2026 · 4 games | 4.6 | 5 | 22 | 4.4 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 5 | 991st / 1995 |
| Yards | 22 | 1409th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 4.4 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 347th / 830 |
| Long | 9 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4249th / 5416 |
| Solo | 1 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Wisconsin | ✓ TE | 61 | ~33 (15–47) | 3 | · | 54% |
| Wk 4 · Purdue | — | 58 | ~22 (10–31) | 1 | · | 38% |
| Wk 5 · North Carolina | — | 75 | ~30 (14–43) | 1 | · | 40% |
| Wk 6 · Stanford | — | 75 | ~29 (13–41) | 1 | · | 39% |
| Wk 7 · BYU | ✓ TE | 80 | ~36 (17–51) | 3 | 1 | 45% |
| Season | 2 GS | 481 | 150 (103–202) | 9 | 1 | 31% |
Position Room
8 TEs on the Notre Dame roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 | Jack Larsen | TE | JR | 6 | 44 | 0 | 9% | +0.27 |
| 87 | Cooper Flanagan | TE | SR | 6 | 48 | 2 | 8% | +0.00 |
| 88 | James Flanigan | TE | SO | 5 | 22 | 1 | 6% | +0.23 |
| Ty Washington | TE | 2 | 12 | 0 | 3% | -0.20 | ||
| 24 | Ian Premer | TE | FR | 1 | 14 | 0 | 4% | +1.06 |
| 42 | Henry Garrity | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Preston Fryzel | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Austin Ratigan | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Notre Dame depth chart →