Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 33 | — |
| Target share | 13.6% | 377th / 522 |
| Catch rate | 54.5% | 414th / 522 |
| Success rate per target | 36.4% | 427th / 522 |
| Yards per target | 5.3 | 467th / 522 |
| Explosive catches | 9.1% | 323rd / 522 |
| Deep-target rate | 3.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 5 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 6 | — |
Charting
Where Resar's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted29 targets charted
Game Log
James Resar's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ South Florida | L 9–19 | 7.5 | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 1 | 21 |
| 2 |  Buffalo | W 33–20 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 3 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 10–16 | 6.8 | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 0 | 13 |
| 4 |  Long Island University | W 20–3 | 6.9 | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 0 | 20 |
| 6 |  New Mexico State | W 22–3 | 6.5 | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 0 | 15 |
| 7 | @ Jacksonville State | L 24–27 | 7.5 | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 0 | 19 |
| 8 |  Middle Tennessee | L 23–26 | 5.2 | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | 12 |
| 2026 · 6 games | 6.7 | 18 | 174 | 9.7 | 1 | 21 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 2 | — |
| Yards | 21 | 854th / 1453 |
| Yards / carry | 10.5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 17 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 18 | 271st / 1994 |
| Yards | 174 | 421st / 1980 |
| Yards / catch | 9.7 | 372nd / 461 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 345th / 824 |
| Long | 21 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · South Florida | ✓ TE | 75 | ~51 (43–62) | 6 | · | 68% |
| Wk 2 · Buffalo | — | 78 | ~59 (50–71) | 5 | · | 76% |
| Wk 3 · Florida Atlantic | — | 78 | ~59 (50–71) | 9 | · | 76% |
| Wk 4 · Long Island University | — | 59 | ~43 (36–52) | 3 | · | 73% |
| Wk 6 · New Mexico State | — | 66 | ~48 (41–58) | 3 | · | 73% |
| Wk 7 · Jacksonville State | — | 73 | ~53 (45–64) | 7 | 2 | 73% |
| Wk 8 · Middle Tennessee | — | 57 | ~31 (14–44) | 2 | · | 54% |
| Season | 1 GS | 486 | 344 (294–411) | 35 | 2 | 71% |
Position Room
7 TEs on the Florida International roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | James Resar | TE | SO | 18 | 174 | 1 | 13% | -0.01 |
| 9 | Jackson Verdugo | TE | SO | 8 | 75 | 0 | 6% | -0.43 |
| 88 | Kevin Schaeffer | TE | SR | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3% | +2.45 |
| 19 | Davis Brown | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Ayden Passley | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Remy Goins | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Sean Burke | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Florida International depth chart →