Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 38 | — |
| Target share | 17.4% | 234th / 527 |
| Catch rate | 65.8% | 253rd / 527 |
| Success rate per target | 60.5% | 87th / 527 |
| Yards per target | 9.7 | 142nd / 527 |
| Explosive catches | 15.8% | 138th / 527 |
| Deep-target rate | 23.7% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 8 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 5 | — |
Charting
Where Dixon-Wyatt's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted39 targets charted
Game Log
Kayden Dixon-Wyatt's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  San José State | W 42–26 | 6.7 | 4 | 36 | 9.0 | 1 | 13 |
| 1 |  Fresno State | W 39–0 | 7.0 | 6 | 102 | 17.0 | 0 | 31 |
| 2 |  Louisiana | W 49–30 | 6.9 | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 1 | 19 |
| 3 | @ Rutgers | W 42–35 | 7.3 | 5 | 77 | 15.4 | 0 | 32 |
| 4 |  Oregon | L 27–41 | 8.6 | 7 | 114 | 16.3 | 1 | 31 |
| 5 |  Washington | W 25–21 | — | · | · | · | · | · |
| 6 | @ Penn State | W 31–23 | 6.4 | 2 | 28 | 14.0 | 1 | 18 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 7.1 | 27 | 400 | 14.8 | 4 | 32 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 1 | — |
| Yards | -5 | 1383rd / 1458 |
| Yards / carry | -5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 0 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 27 | 110th / 1995 |
| Yards | 400 | 84th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 14.8 | 124th / 463 |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 43rd / 830 |
| Long | 32 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 1 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · San José State | ✓ WR | 76 | ~44 (29–54) | 5 | · | 58% |
| Wk 1 · Fresno State | ✓ WR | 68 | ~42 (28–51) | 6 | · | 62% |
| Wk 2 · Louisiana | ✓ WR | 72 | ~42 (28–51) | 4 | · | 58% |
| Wk 3 · Rutgers | — | 63 | ~52 (34–63) | 9 | 1 | 83% |
| Wk 4 · Oregon | ✓ WR | 75 | ~61 (40–74) | 10 | · | 81% |
| Wk 5 · Washington | ✓ WR | 69 | ~42 (28–51) | 4 | · | 61% |
| Wk 6 · Penn State | ✓ WR | 63 | ~22 (7–30) | 3 | · | 35% |
| Season | 6 GS | 486 | 305 (256–355) | 41 | 1 | 63% |
Position Room
12 WRs on the USC roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | Kayden Dixon-Wyatt | WR | FR | 27 | 400 | 4 | 16% | +0.69 |
| 4 | Trent Mosley | WR | FR | 22 | 366 | 5 | 23% | +0.96 |
| Zach Williams | WR | 18 | 315 | 1 | 10% | +0.99 | ||
| 16 | Tanook Hines | WR | SO | 15 | 195 | 4 | 13% | +0.72 |
| 10 | Corey Simms | WR | SO | 12 | 178 | 1 | 12% | +0.67 |
| 1 | Ethan Feaster | WR | FR | 8 | 78 | 0 | 4% | +0.43 |
| 85 | Tron Baker | WR | FR | 8 | 111 | 0 | 5% | +0.85 |
| 9 | Terrell Anderson | WR | JR | 2 | 50 | 0 | 9% | +0.94 |
| 18 | Romero Ison | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Cameron Sermons | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 86 | Luke Degner | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Griffin Brahm | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. USC depth chart →