Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Defense | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Havoc plays | 2 | 1191st / 2577 |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Run stops | 5 | 1351st / 3269 |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| Pass breakups | 2 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Forced fumbles | 0 | — |
| Tackles | 20 | — |
Charting
Where Condoll's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
The play-by-play names the defender on breakups, interceptions and tackles, but not the man in coverage on every throw, so true times-targeted isn't in the text. Coverage plays is the closest stand-in; exact targets come from hand charting.
Game Log
Kyren Condoll's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Defense | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 |  Houston Christian | W 31–3 | 4.7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2 | @ Notre Dame | L 0–52 | 5.9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 3 |  Western Michigan | L 21–28 | 6.0 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 4 | @ Fresno State | L 24–38 | 4.7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 5 |  UTSA | L 14–16 | 5.6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 6 | @ East Carolina | L 12–28 | 2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 7 |  Tulsa | L 17–38 | 5.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | · | · |
| 2026 · 7 games | 5.0 | 21 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 21 | 881st / 5416 |
| Solo | 10 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 1 | 713th / 1595 |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Opp. plays | Est. snaps | Plays made | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Houston Christian | ✓ CB | 58 | ~21 (0–35) | 2 | · | 36% |
| Wk 2 · Notre Dame | ✓ CB | 65 | ~64 (26–65) | 4 | · | 98% |
| Wk 3 · Western Michigan | ✓ CB | 63 | ~62 (25–63) | 6 | · | 98% |
| Wk 4 · Fresno State | ✓ CB | 68 | ~66 (27–68) | 2 | · | 97% |
| Wk 5 · UTSA | ✓ CB | 71 | ~70 (28–71) | 5 | 1 | 99% |
| Wk 6 · East Carolina | ✓ CB | 75 | ~51 (21–54) | 2 | · | 68% |
| Wk 7 · Tulsa | ✓ CB | 63 | ~10 (0–31) | 1 | 1 | 16% |
| Season | 7 GS | 463 | 344 (261–383) | 22 | 2 | 74% |
Position Room
16 DBs on the Rice roster, ordered by tkl
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | AJ Brown | S | SR | 52 | 3 | 0 | — | 2 |
| 3 | Koa Akui | S | SR | 36 | 6 | 0 | — | 4 |
| 12 | Jamir Benjamin | CB | SO | 33 | 2.5 | 0 | — | 2 |
| 10 | Kyren Condoll | CB | SO | 21 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 0 | Daveon Hook | S | SR | 8 | 1.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 18 | Ahran Ogbor | S | SO | 8 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 20 | Bailey Fletcher | S | SO | 8 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 5 | Jerrick Harper | CB | SR | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | Zach Cody | CB | SO | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 6 | Dylan Stephens | S | SO | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 27 | Michael Amey III | S | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 2 |
| 4 | Tariq Watson | CB | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | Jordan Mitchell | CB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | Seth Brown | S | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | Elijah Brown | CB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | Austin Lee | S | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes —+ plays per team game. Rice depth chart →