Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 5 | — |
| Target share | 5.2% | — |
| Catch rate | 40.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 40.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 4.2 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 20.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 0 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
Charting
Where Deyon's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted5 targets charted
Game Log
London Deyon's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | Defense | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 | @ Troy | L 21–24 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 2 |  Tulsa | L 17–23 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 3 |  Nicholls | W 59–0 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 4 | @ Texas Tech | L 14–49 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 6 | @ Liberty | L 3–35 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 7 |  Western Kentucky | L 3–16 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 8 |  New Mexico State | L 24–30 | 6.3 | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 2026 · 1 game | 6.3 | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 2 | 1397th / 1995 |
| Yards | 21 | 1424th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 10.5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 12 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4244th / 5408 |
| Solo | 1 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 2 · Tulsa | 64 | ~25 (12–36) | 1 | · | 39% |
| Wk 7 · Western Kentucky | 57 | ~34 (16–49) | 1 | · | 60% |
| Wk 8 · New Mexico State | 52 | ~38 (18–52) | 3 | 1 | 73% |
| Season | 444 | 97 (53–129) | 5 | 1 | 22% |
Position Room
7 TEs on the Sam Houston roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87 | Max Whisner | TE | SR | 6 | 47 | 0 | 6% | +0.30 |
| 80 | Matt Smith | TE | SR | 5 | 33 | 0 | 4% | -0.05 |
| 14 | London Deyon | TE | SO | 2 | 21 | 0 | 5% | -0.13 |
| 82 | Cooper Stevens | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Cade Hays | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 86 | Jack Merryman | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Brock Kuhl | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Sam Houston depth chart →