Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 11 | — |
| Target share | 6.5% | — |
| Catch rate | 63.6% | — |
| Success rate per target | 45.5% | — |
| Yards per target | 5.8 | — |
| Explosive catches | 9.1% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Skinner's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted12 targets charted
Game Log
Mikkel Skinner's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 |  Youngstown State | W 45–13 | 8.5 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 1 | 28 |
| 2 |  Alabama | L 17–45 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||||
| 3 | @ Texas A&M | W 31–21 | 5.5 | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 |
| 4 |  South Alabama | W 45–21 | 6.2 | · | · | · | · | · | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 0 | 20 |
| 5 | @ South Carolina | W 35–34 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||||
| 6 |  LSU | W 35–34 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||||
| 7 | @ Oklahoma | W 21–13 | 5.4 | 1 | 16 | 16.0 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 · 4 games | 6.4 | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 0 | 16 | 8 | 92 | 11.5 | 1 | 28 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 4 | — |
| Yards | 33 | 733rd / 1458 |
| Yards / carry | 8.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 16 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 8 | 703rd / 1995 |
| Yards | 92 | 713th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 11.5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 347th / 830 |
| Long | 28 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Youngstown State | 59 | ~36 (17–51) | 5 | 1 | 61% |
| Wk 3 · Texas A&M | 53 | ~32 (15–46) | 4 | · | 60% |
| Wk 4 · South Alabama | 68 | ~22 (10–31) | 2 | · | 32% |
| Wk 5 · South Carolina | 78 | ~16 (7–23) | 1 | · | 21% |
| Wk 6 · LSU | 68 | ~16 (7–23) | 1 | · | 24% |
| Wk 7 · Oklahoma | 55 | ~27 (13–39) | 3 | · | 49% |
| Season | 446 | 149 (114–208) | 16 | 1 | 33% |
Position Room
5 TEs on the Kentucky roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | Willie Rodriguez | TE | JR | 33 | 257 | 3 | 19% | +0.35 |
| 87 | Henry Boyer | TE | SR | 9 | 120 | 3 | 6% | +0.75 |
| 8 | Mikkel Skinner | TE | SO | 8 | 92 | 1 | 6% | +0.46 |
| 44 | Justin Kattus | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Elijah Brown | TE | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Kentucky depth chart →