EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 23 | — |
| Success rate | 26.1% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 8.7% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 17.4% | — |
| First downs | 4 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 0 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 0 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 5 | — |
| Target share | 6.4% | — |
| Catch rate | 60.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 40.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 4.4 | — |
| Explosive catches | 20.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 3 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
Where Joseph's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
2 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far | Florida International#112 · 3-4 | 6 | 14% | 22 | 80 | 3.6 | 0 | 26.1% |
| 2025 | Florida International#104 · 7-6 | 3 | 4% | 7 | 123 | 17.6 | 2 | — |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Sterling Joseph's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Sterling Joseph's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ | L 9–19 | — | · | · | · | · | · | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 4 |
| 2 | W 33–20 | 4.1 | 8 | 24 | 3.0 | 0 | 15 | · | · | · | · | · | |
| 3 | @ | L 10–16 | — | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 2 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 4 | W 20–3 | 5.0 | 5 | 25 | 5.0 | 0 | 13 | · | · | · | · | · | |
| 6 | W 22–3 | 4.2 | 5 | 17 | 3.4 | 0 | 7 | · | · | · | · | · | |
| 7 | @ | L 24–27 | — | no stats recorded | |||||||||
| 8 | L 23–26 | 6.4 | 3 | 12 | 4.0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 21 | 21.0 | 1 | 21 | |
| 2026 · 6 games | 4.9 | 22 | 80 | 3.6 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 1 | 21 | ||
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 22 | — |
| Yards | 80 | 504th / 1456 |
| Yards / carry | 3.6 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 15 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 3 | 1249th / 1995 |
| Yards | 22 | 1406th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 7.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 346th / 825 |
| Long | 21 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · South Florida | 75 | ~8 (2–16) | 2 | 11% |
| Wk 2 · Buffalo | 78 | ~19 (13–25) | 9 | 24% |
| Wk 3 · Florida Atlantic | 78 | ~5 (1–10) | 1 | 6% |
| Wk 4 · Long Island University | 59 | ~11 (3–21) | 5 | 19% |
| Wk 6 · New Mexico State | 66 | ~12 (3–23) | 5 | 18% |
| Wk 8 · Middle Tennessee | 57 | ~13 (3–25) | 6 | 23% |
| Season | 486 | 68 (50–148) | 28 | 14% |
6 RBs on the Florida International roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Devonte Lyons | RB | SO | 84 | 383 | 4.6 | 1 | 7 | +0.04 |
| 1 | Anthony Carrie | RB | SO | 82 | 258 | 3.1 | 1 | 7 | -0.07 |
| 22 | Sterling Joseph | RB | FR | 22 | 80 | 3.6 | 0 | 3 | -0.09 |
| 10 | Jayden Ford | RB | FR | 5 | 40 | 8 | 0 | 1 | -0.07 |
| 21 | Nate Henry | RB | JR | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | — | +0.34 |
| 36 | Justin Compere | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Florida International depth chart →