Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 31 | — |
| Success rate | 38.7% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 16.1% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 22.6% | — |
| First downs | 7 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 8 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Swint's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Run direction32 carries
Game Log
Taevion Swint's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | Returns | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long | KR | KR yds | PR | PR yds | TD |
| 1 |  Bethune-Cookman | W 73–6 | 8.0 | 4 | 48 | 12.0 | 1 | 27 | 1 | 16 | 16.0 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 57 | · | · | · |
| 2 | @ Pittsburgh | L 7–12 | — | 2 | -1 | -0.5 | 0 | 1 | · | · | · | · | · | 2 | 42 | · | · | · |
| 3 |  Georgia State | W 44–30 | 6.2 | 9 | 40 | 4.4 | 0 | 21 | · | · | · | · | · | 3 | 88 | · | · | · |
| 4 |  TCU | W 21–13 | 6.0 | 7 | 29 | 4.1 | 1 | 13 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 5 | @ Houston | L 17–27 | 4.8 | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 0 | 10 | 1 | -4 | -4.0 | 0 | 0 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 6 | @ Oklahoma State | L 28–42 | 5.1 | 7 | 27 | 3.9 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 22 | · | · | · |
| 2026 · 6 games | 6.0 | 32 | 162 | 5.1 | 2 | 27 | 4 | 18 | 4.5 | 0 | 16 | 7 | 209 | · | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 32 | — |
| Yards | 162 | 343rd / 1456 |
| Yards / carry | 5.1 | — |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 221st / 631 |
| Long | 27 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 4 | 1115th / 1995 |
| Yards | 18 | 1478th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 4.5 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 16 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4244th / 5408 |
| Solo | 1 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
| Kick returns | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Returns | 7 | — |
| Yards | 209 | — |
| Average | 29.9 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 57 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Special teams | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Bethune-Cookman | 60 | ~12 (3–23) | 5 | · | 1 | 20% |
| Wk 2 · Pittsburgh | 54 | ~11 (3–21) | 2 | 1 | 2 | 20% |
| Wk 3 · Georgia State | 56 | ~16 (11–21) | 10 | · | 3 | 29% |
| Wk 4 · TCU | 53 | ~17 (12–22) | 8 | · | · | 32% |
| Wk 5 · Houston | 59 | ~14 (4–27) | 4 | · | · | 24% |
| Wk 6 · Oklahoma State | 83 | ~20 (14–26) | 8 | · | 1 | 24% |
| Season | 365 | 90 (71–111) | 37 | 1 | 7 | 25% |
Position Room
7 RBs on the UCF roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke Watson | RB | 70 | 483 | 6.9 | 3 | 6 | +0.13 | ||
| 4 | Taevion Swint | RB | FR | 32 | 162 | 5.1 | 2 | 4 | +0.01 |
| 11 | Landen Chambers | RB | JR | 26 | 139 | 5.3 | 3 | 3 | +0.21 |
| 20 | Kaj Baker | RB | FR | 6 | 30 | 5 | 0 | — | +0.14 |
| 35 | Agyeman Addae | RB | SO | 4 | 74 | 18.5 | 1 | 1 | +1.38 |
| 24 | Arthur Lewis IV | RB | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | -0.47 |
| 42 | Chance Nixon | RB | FR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. UCF depth chart →