Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 18 | — |
| Target share | 14.4% | 345th / 524 |
| Catch rate | 72.2% | 134th / 524 |
| Success rate per target | 55.6% | 143rd / 524 |
| Yards per target | 7.7 | 294th / 524 |
| Explosive catches | 11.1% | 262nd / 524 |
| Deep-target rate | 16.7% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 3 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 3 | — |
Charting
Where Ohrstrom's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted16 targets charted
2025 charting · Texas A&M
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (4 of Ohrstrom’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted9 targets charted
Career
3 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  SMU#31 · 5-1 | 4 | 38% | 13 | 138 | 4 | 14.4% |
| 2025 |  Texas A&M#10 · 11-2 | 9 | 40% | 19 | 168 | 1 | 7.6% |
| 2024 | Texas A&M#20 · 8-5 | 7 | 20% | 10 | 184 | 2 | 6.7% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Theo Melin Ohrstrom's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Theo Melin Ohrstrom's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Florida State | W 27–24 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 |  UC Davis | W 56–10 | 7.9 | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 2 | 14 |
| 3 | @ Louisville | L 31–41 | 7.3 | 5 | 43 | 8.6 | 0 | 32 |
| 4 |  Missouri State | W 34–24 | 8.7 | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 2 | 23 |
| 5 |  Boston College | W 25–16 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 7 |  Virginia | W 23–13 | 6.0 | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 0 | 13 |
| 2026 · 4 games | 7.5 | 13 | 138 | 10.6 | 4 | 32 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 13 | 425th / 1995 |
| Yards | 138 | 505th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 10.6 | 336th / 461 |
| Touchdowns | 4 | 42nd / 826 |
| Long | 32 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4248th / 5410 |
| Solo | 0 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 2 · UC Davis | — | 55 | ~27 (13–39) | 3 | · | · | 49% |
| Wk 3 · Louisville | — | 79 | ~47 (40–57) | 6 | · | · | 59% |
| Wk 4 · Missouri State | — | 78 | ~40 (34–48) | 4 | 1 | · | 51% |
| Wk 7 · Virginia | ✓ TE | 69 | ~44 (37–53) | 5 | · | 1 | 64% |
| Season | 1 GS | 411 | 158 (109–212) | 18 | 1 | 1 | 38% |
Position Room
8 TEs on the SMU roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Randy Pittman Jr. | TE | SR | 19 | 172 | 4 | 11% | +0.68 |
| 18 | Theo Melin Ohrstrom | TE | SR | 13 | 138 | 4 | — | — |
| 9 | Zack Turner | TE | FR | 3 | 53 | 1 | 9% | +1.54 |
| 84 | Tripp Riordan | TE | SR | 2 | 15 | 0 | 9% | +0.98 |
| 42 | Will Locke | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Andre Nickerson Jr. | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 88 | Trey Jackson | TE | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Miles Uter | TE | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. SMU depth chart →