EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS RB who qualifies
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 130 | — |
| Success rate | 43.8% | 186th / 321 |
| Explosive run rate | 12.3% | 186th / 321 |
| Stuffed at the line | 18.5% | 233rd / 321 |
| First downs | 38 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 31 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 11 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 9 | — |
| Target share | 6.7% | — |
| Catch rate | 100.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 44.4% | — |
| Yards per target | 6.6 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Where Baugh's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (4 of Baugh’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
3 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Car | Rush yds | Y/C | Rush TD | Rush SR | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far | Florida#17 · 5-2 | 7 | 59% | 135 | 763 | 5.7 | 13 | 43.8% | 9 | 59 | 0 | 6.7% |
| 2025 | Florida#53 · 4-8 | 12 | 70% | 220 | 1170 | 5.3 | 8 | 49.5% | 33 | 210 | 2 | 15.2% |
| 2024 | Florida#24 · 8-5 | 13 | 36% | 133 | 673 | 5.1 | 7 | 41.7% | 4 | 33 | 1 | 4.5% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Jadan Baugh's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Jadan Baugh's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 135 | — |
| Yards | 763 | 9th / 1453 |
| Yards / carry | 5.7 | 65th / 326 |
| Touchdowns | 13 | 2nd / 630 |
| Long | 75 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 9 | 628th / 1994 |
| Yards | 59 | 957th / 1980 |
| Yards / catch | 6.6 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 14 | — |
| Punt returns | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Returns | 1 | — |
| Yards | 4 | — |
| Average | 4 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 4 | — |
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Special teams | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Florida Atlantic | ✓ RB | 67 | ~29 (20–38) | 14 | · | 43% |
| Wk 2 · Campbell | ✓ RB | 62 | ~28 (19–36) | 14 | · | 45% |
| Wk 3 · Auburn | ✓ RB | 75 | ~48 (41–53) | 27 | · | 64% |
| Wk 4 · Ole Miss | ✓ RB | 76 | ~51 (43–57) | 30 | · | 67% |
| Wk 5 · Missouri | ✓ RB | 64 | ~35 (24–45) | 15 | · | 55% |
| Wk 6 · South Carolina | ✓ RB | 74 | ~45 (38–50) | 17 | · | 61% |
| Wk 7 · Texas | ✓ RB | 81 | ~59 (50–65) | 28 | 1 | 73% |
| Season | 7 GS | 499 | 295 (251–333) | 145 | 1 | 59% |
8 RBs on the Florida roster, ordered by car
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Car | Yds | YPC | TD | Rec | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | Jadan Baugh | RB | JR | 135 | 763 | 5.7 | 13 | 9 | +0.27 |
| 20 | Duke Clark | RB | SO | 36 | 265 | 7.4 | 3 | 5 | +0.32 |
| 21 | Evan Pryor | RB | SR | 18 | 44 | 2.4 | 0 | 6 | -0.22 |
| 24 | London Montgomery | RB | SR | 13 | 56 | 4.3 | 0 | 1 | -0.07 |
| 27 | Byron Louis | RB | SO | 6 | 34 | 5.7 | 0 | 1 | +0.57 |
| 25 | Anthony Rubio | RB | SR | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 0 | — | +0.03 |
| 33 | Brian Case | RB | SO | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | Kelvin Jimenez | RB | JR | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 6+ plays per team game. Florida depth chart →