Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 10 | — |
| Target share | 12.2% | — |
| Catch rate | 60.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 40.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 5.1 | — |
| Explosive catches | 10.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 20.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 2 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Nash's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted13 targets charted
Game Log
Jeremiah Nash's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Oklahoma | L 0–51 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 2 |  Texas Southern | W 51–10 | 6.1 | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 0 | 29 |
| 3 | @ Michigan | L 17–52 | 4.5 | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 | 10 |
| 4 |  Oregon State | L 7–33 | 4.6 | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 | 7 |
| 5 | @ New Mexico | L 7–61 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 6 |  Nevada | L 13–30 | — | no stats recorded | ||||
| 7 |  San José State | L 11–24 | 5.7 | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 0 | 29 |
| 2026 · 4 games | 5.2 | 8 | 82 | 10.3 | 0 | 29 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 8 | 700th / 1995 |
| Yards | 82 | 777th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 10.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 29 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 0 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Oklahoma | — | 56 | ~34 (11–47) | 4 | · | 61% |
| Wk 2 · Texas Southern | — | 54 | ~19 (6–26) | 2 | · | 35% |
| Wk 3 · Michigan | ✓ WR | 47 | ~7 (2–11) | 1 | · | 15% |
| Wk 4 · Oregon State | ✓ WR | 65 | ~38 (12–52) | 3 | 1 | 58% |
| Wk 5 · New Mexico | — | 54 | ~28 (9–38) | 1 | · | 52% |
| Wk 7 · San José State | — | 84 | ~46 (30–56) | 3 | 1 | 55% |
| Season | 2 GS | 411 | 172 (107–209) | 14 | 2 | 42% |
Position Room
13 WRs on the UTEP roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Jaden Smith | WR | SR | 28 | 233 | 1 | 20% | +0.40 |
| 5 | Carver Cheeks | WR | SR | 16 | 179 | 3 | 16% | +0.17 |
| 81 | Jeremiah Nash | WR | JR | 8 | 82 | 0 | 8% | -0.90 |
| 2 | Royal Capell | WR | SO | 4 | 40 | 0 | 11% | +0.27 |
| 13 | Nik Henry | WR | SO | 4 | 50 | 0 | 4% | +1.11 |
| 14 | Marcus Torres | WR | SO | 2 | 10 | 0 | 11% | +0.04 |
| 7 | Jaylan Brown | WR | SO | 1 | 6 | 0 | 8% | -1.23 |
| 17 | Carmelo Taylor | WR | JR | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3% | +0.07 |
| 18 | Rafeald Campbell | WR | SO | 1 | 8 | 0 | — | — |
| 16 | Mason Ferguson | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | CJ Simon | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | Zo Hill | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Jacaleb Johnson | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. UTEP depth chart →