Jesse Legree
Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 61 | — |
| Target share | 23.7% | 86th / 522 |
| Catch rate | 68.9% | 188th / 522 |
| Success rate per target | 59.0% | 105th / 522 |
| Yards per target | 14.6 | 12th / 522 |
| Explosive catches | 23.0% | 44th / 522 |
| Deep-target rate | 34.4% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 12 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 10 | — |
Charting
Where Legree's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted63 targets charted
Game Log
Jesse Legree's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Houston | L 20–33 | 8.9 | 5 | 136 | 27.2 | 1 | 71 |
| 2 |  Texas Tech | L 24–35 | 10.0 | 8 | 240 | 30.0 | 2 | 75 |
| 3 |  Montana | W 52–17 | 8.2 | 4 | 100 | 25.0 | 1 | 48 |
| 4 | @ UTEP | W 33–7 | 8.8 | 6 | 109 | 18.2 | 2 | 46 |
| 5 | @ Colorado State | W 56–26 | 9.8 | 5 | 156 | 31.2 | 3 | 52 |
| 6 |  San Diego State | W 66–14 | 10.0 | 10 | 191 | 19.1 | 3 | 71 |
| 7 |  Washington State | W 48–30 | 8.9 | 8 | 108 | 13.5 | 2 | 90 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 9.2 | 46 | 1040 | 22.6 | 14 | 90 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 46 | 14th / 1994 |
| Yards | 1040 | 1st / 1980 |
| Yards / catch | 22.6 | 3rd / 461 |
| Touchdowns | 14 | 1st / 824 |
| Long | 90 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4239th / 5406 |
| Solo | 0 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Special teams | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Houston | ✓ WR | 73 | ~58 (38–71) | 8 | · | · | 79% |
| Wk 2 · Texas Tech | ✓ WR | 71 | ~61 (40–71) | 11 | 1 | 1 | 86% |
| Wk 3 · Montana | — | 68 | ~47 (31–57) | 7 | · | · | 69% |
| Wk 4 · UTEP | ✓ WR | 57 | ~48 (32–57) | 10 | · | · | 84% |
| Wk 5 · Colorado State | ✓ WR | 70 | ~53 (35–65) | 6 | · | · | 76% |
| Wk 6 · San Diego State | ✓ WR | 92 | ~73 (48–89) | 11 | · | · | 79% |
| Wk 7 · Washington State | — | 71 | ~62 (41–71) | 12 | · | · | 87% |
| Season | 5 GS | 502 | 402 (337–468) | 65 | 1 | 1 | 80% |
Position Room
14 WRs on the Oregon State roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Jesse Legree | WR | FR | 46 | 1040 | 14 | 22% | +1.10 |
| 7 | Aeryn Hampton | WR | SO | 21 | 245 | 1 | 15% | +0.52 |
| 0 | Aaron Butler | WR | SO | 14 | 206 | 1 | 11% | +0.26 |
| 16 | Cynai Thomas | WR | FR | 11 | 134 | 0 | 5% | +0.63 |
| 4 | Xayvion Noland | WR | JR | 5 | 41 | 0 | 6% | +0.81 |
| 15 | Jameson Powell | WR | FR | 3 | 20 | 1 | 5% | +0.45 |
| 14 | Eddie Freauff | WR | SO | 2 | 17 | 1 | 4% | +0.81 |
| 17 | Malachi Durant | WR | SO | 2 | 21 | 0 | 3% | +0.49 |
| 1 | Adonis McDaniel | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 5 | Karson Boschma | WR | SR | — | — | — | 2% | -0.75 |
| 18 | Jayden Padgett | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | MJ Kennybrew | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | Jhae Drummer | WR | SR | — | — | — | 3% | -0.94 |
| 88 | Ross Nickson | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Oregon State depth chart →