Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 10 | — |
| Target share | 5.8% | — |
| Catch rate | 70.0% | — |
| Success rate per target | 30.0% | — |
| Yards per target | 5.5 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 10.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 1 | — |
Charting
Where Johnson's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted12 targets charted
2025 charting · Wake Forest
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (6 of Johnson’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted11 targets charted
Career
4 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Wake Forest#22 · 6-1 | 6 | 41% | 9 | 64 | 1 | 5.8% |
| 2025 | Wake Forest#57 · 9-4 | 8 | 33% | 11 | 122 | 1 | 6.2% |
| 2024 |  Vanderbilt#50 · 7-6 | 1 | 5% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5.1% |
| 2023 | Vanderbilt#115 · 2-10 | 8 | 24% | 10 | 99 | 2 | 4.7% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Kamrean Johnson's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Kamrean Johnson's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 9 | 631st / 1995 |
| Yards | 64 | 910th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 7.1 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 346th / 825 |
| Long | 17 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Akron | — | 67 | ~29 (13–41) | 2 | · | 43% |
| Wk 3 · Miami | — | 63 | ~34 (16–49) | 3 | · | 54% |
| Wk 4 · Louisville | ✓ TE | 61 | ~25 (12–36) | 1 | 2 | 41% |
| Wk 5 · Stanford | — | 66 | ~36 (17–51) | 2 | · | 55% |
| Wk 6 · NC State | — | 70 | ~34 (16–49) | 2 | · | 49% |
| Wk 7 · California | — | 62 | ~28 (13–40) | 2 | · | 45% |
| Season | 1 GS | 457 | 186 (142–259) | 12 | 2 | 41% |
Position Room
6 TEs on the Wake Forest roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Kamrean Johnson | TE | SR | 9 | 64 | 1 | 6% | +0.17 |
| 84 | Dominick Barry | TE | FR | 6 | 116 | 3 | 5% | +0.88 |
| 85 | Will Loerzel | TE | SO | 5 | 40 | 1 | 6% | +0.08 |
| 48 | Matthew Lusardi | TE | SR | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3% | +1.90 |
| 81 | Landon Morris | TE | SR | 1 | 13 | 0 | 9% | -0.17 |
| 89 | Brady Shust | TE | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Wake Forest depth chart →