Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 9 | — |
| Target share | 13.4% | — |
| Catch rate | 77.8% | — |
| Success rate per target | 55.6% | — |
| Yards per target | 12.0 | — |
| Explosive catches | 22.2% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 11.1% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
Charting
Where Choice's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted9 targets charted
Game Log
Manny Choice's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | Defense | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long | Tkl | Solo | TFL | Sacks | Hur | PD | INT | TD |
| 1 |  UTEP | W 51–0 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 2 | @ Michigan | L 10–17 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 3 |  New Mexico | W 14–6 | — | no stats recorded | ||||||||||||
| 4 | @ Georgia | L 13–41 | 5.9 | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 1 | 14 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 6 | vs Texas | W 27–24 | 5.1 | 2 | 10 | 5.0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · |
| 7 |  Kentucky | L 13–21 | 7.8 | 5 | 98 | 19.6 | 0 | 34 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2026 · 3 games | 6.3 | 8 | 122 | 15.3 | 1 | 34 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 8 | 697th / 1995 |
| Yards | 122 | 558th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 15.3 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 346th / 825 |
| Long | 34 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4244th / 5408 |
| Solo | 1 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · UTEP | 59 | ~12 (4–20) | 1 | · | 20% |
| Wk 4 · Georgia | 68 | ~12 (4–20) | 1 | · | 18% |
| Wk 6 · Texas | 57 | ~44 (29–54) | 3 | 1 | 77% |
| Wk 7 · Kentucky | 72 | ~52 (34–63) | 6 | · | 72% |
| Season | 376 | 120 (68–158) | 11 | 1 | 32% |
Position Room
15 WRs on the Oklahoma roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Isaiah Sategna III | WR | SR | 33 | 414 | 2 | 29% | +0.35 |
| 0 | Manny Choice | WR | SO | 8 | 122 | 1 | 9% | +0.74 |
| 3 | Parker Livingstone | WR | SO | 6 | 51 | 0 | 3% | +0.25 |
| 11 | Trell Harris | WR | SR | 6 | 104 | 1 | 20% | +0.79 |
| Elijah Thomas | WR | 5 | 49 | 0 | 11% | -0.23 | ||
| 17 | Mackenzie Alleyne | WR | SO | 4 | 40 | 1 | 7% | +0.21 |
| 5 | Jer'Michael Carter | WR | SR | 1 | 8 | 0 | 9% | -0.30 |
| 7 | Jacob Jordan | WR | JR | 1 | 10 | 0 | 3% | +0.36 |
| 2 | Jahsiear Rogers | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | Daniel Odom | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | Jayden Petit | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Eli Merck | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 82 | Ivan Carreon | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Xavier Okwufulueze | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Trey Brown | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Oklahoma depth chart →