Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Rushing | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 5 | — |
| Success rate | 40.0% | — |
| Explosive run rate | 20.0% | — |
| Stuffed at the line | 40.0% | — |
| First downs | 2 | — |
| Red-zone carries | 1 | — |
| Goal-line carries | 0 | — |
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 22 | — |
| Target share | 10.2% | 488th / 522 |
| Catch rate | 72.7% | 125th / 522 |
| Success rate per target | 36.4% | 427th / 522 |
| Yards per target | 6.1 | 422nd / 522 |
| Explosive catches | 9.1% | 323rd / 522 |
| Deep-target rate | 13.6% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 3 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
Charting
Where Hunter's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted22 targets charted
2025 charting · Nebraska
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (5 of Hunter’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted23 targets charted
Career
3 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Nebraska#15 · 5-2 | 7 | 50% | 16 | 134 | 0 | 10.2% |
| 2025 | Nebraska#61 · 7-6 | 12 | 62% | 43 | 617 | 5 | 20.7% |
| 2024 |  California#67 · 6-7 | 12 | 45% | 40 | 578 | 5 | 9.9% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Nyziah Hunter's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Nyziah Hunter's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Rushing | Receiving | Returns | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Car | Yds | Y/C | TD | Long | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long | KR | KR yds | PR | PR yds | TD |
| 1 |  Ohio | W 49–21 | 3.3 | · | · | · | · | · | 1 | 17 | 17.0 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 8 | · | · | · |
| 2 |  Bowling Green | W 56–7 | 5.3 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 54 | · | · | · |
| 3 |  North Dakota | W 34–7 | 5.6 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 24 | 8.0 | 0 | 20 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 4 | @ Michigan State | W 31–13 | 3.6 | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 18 | · | · | · |
| 5 |  Maryland | W 48–23 | 4.8 | · | · | · | · | · | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 57 | · | · | · |
| 6 |  Indiana | L 17–20 | 7.2 | 2 | 10 | 5.0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 43 | 8.6 | 0 | 24 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 7 | @ Oregon | L 14–17 | 2.4 | · | · | · | · | · | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 39 | · | · | · |
| 2026 · 7 games | 4.6 | 5 | 18 | 3.6 | 1 | 10 | 16 | 134 | 8.4 | 0 | 24 | 10 | 176 | · | · | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 5 | — |
| Yards | 18 | 900th / 1453 |
| Yards / carry | 3.6 | — |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 359th / 630 |
| Long | 10 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 16 | 322nd / 1994 |
| Yards | 134 | 516th / 1980 |
| Yards / catch | 8.4 | 413th / 461 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 24 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4239th / 5406 |
| Solo | 1 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
| Kick returns | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Returns | 10 | — |
| Yards | 176 | — |
| Average | 17.6 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 33 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Special teams | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Ohio | ✓ WR | 74 | ~12 (4–20) | 1 | · | 1 | 16% |
| Wk 2 · Bowling Green | ✓ WR | 66 | ~35 (11–48) | 3 | · | 2 | 53% |
| Wk 3 · North Dakota | ✓ WR | 71 | ~49 (32–60) | 7 | · | · | 69% |
| Wk 4 · Michigan State | — | 67 | ~18 (6–25) | 2 | · | 1 | 27% |
| Wk 5 · Maryland | ✓ WR | 75 | ~51 (34–62) | 4 | · | 3 | 68% |
| Wk 6 · Indiana | — | 83 | ~51 (34–62) | 7 | 1 | · | 61% |
| Wk 7 · Oregon | ✓ WR | 67 | ~38 (12–52) | 3 | · | 3 | 57% |
| Season | 5 GS | 503 | 254 (158–308) | 27 | 1 | 10 | 50% |
Position Room
16 WRs on the Nebraska roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | Kwazi Gilmer | WR | JR | 38 | 492 | 7 | 26% | +0.44 |
| 2 | Jacory Barney Jr. | WR | JR | 29 | 378 | 2 | 17% | +0.70 |
| 13 | Nyziah Hunter | WR | SR | 16 | 134 | 0 | 9% | +0.03 |
| 18 | Quinn Clark | WR | JR | 6 | 63 | 1 | 5% | -0.05 |
| 4 | Janiran Bonner | WR | SR | 3 | 13 | 0 | 3% | -0.43 |
| 19 | Cortez Mills Jr. | WR | SO | 2 | 23 | 0 | 9% | +0.88 |
| 11 | Demitrius Bell | WR | SR | 1 | -2 | 0 | 3% | -0.39 |
| 17 | Larry Miles | WR | FR | 1 | -1 | 0 | 4% | -0.54 |
| 15 | Keelan Smith | WR | JR | — | — | — | 3% | -1.11 |
| 24 | Nalin Scott | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | Roman Mangini | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Hayes Miller | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | DJ Singleton Jr. | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Jamari Brown | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 88 | Jackson Carpenter | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Maurice Purify II | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Nebraska depth chart →