Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 43 | — |
| Target share | 23.2% | 97th / 527 |
| Catch rate | 51.2% | 450th / 527 |
| Success rate per target | 41.9% | 369th / 527 |
| Yards per target | 5.0 | 484th / 527 |
| Explosive catches | 2.3% | 481st / 527 |
| Deep-target rate | 18.6% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 9 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 2 | — |
Charting
Where Jr.'s plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted54 targets charted
Game Log
Onterrio Smith Jr.'s box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Eastern Michigan | L 17–28 | 7.7 | 9 | 86 | 9.6 | 0 | 17 |
| 1 |  Mississippi Valley State | W 52–0 | 5.5 | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 0 | 8 |
| 2 | @ Fresno State | L 3–49 | 7.0 | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 0 | 36 |
| 3 |  North Dakota State | L 10–31 | 6.7 | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 1 | 21 |
| 4 |  Massachusetts | L 6–35 | 5.9 | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 0 | 15 |
| 6 | @ Bowling Green | L 10–38 | 6.2 | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 0 | 14 |
| 7 |  Ohio | L 7–48 | 6.3 | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 0 | 15 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 6.5 | 30 | 314 | 10.5 | 1 | 36 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 30 | 79th / 1995 |
| Yards | 314 | 156th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 10.5 | 343rd / 463 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 347th / 830 |
| Long | 36 | — |
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 1 | 4249th / 5416 |
| Solo | 1 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 0 | — |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 0 | — |
| Passes defended | 0 | — |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Plays made | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Eastern Michigan | ✓ WR | 63 | ~55 (36–63) | 13 | · | 1 | 87% |
| Wk 1 · Mississippi Valley State | ✓ WR | 71 | ~49 (32–60) | 5 | · | 1 | 69% |
| Wk 2 · Fresno State | ✓ WR | 66 | ~56 (37–66) | 8 | · | · | 85% |
| Wk 3 · North Dakota State | ✓ WR | 66 | ~53 (35–65) | 9 | · | · | 80% |
| Wk 4 · Massachusetts | ✓ WR | 77 | ~56 (37–68) | 7 | · | · | 73% |
| Wk 6 · Bowling Green | ✓ WR | 63 | ~55 (36–63) | 9 | · | · | 87% |
| Wk 7 · Ohio | ✓ WR | 52 | ~43 (28–52) | 8 | 1 | · | 83% |
| Season | 7 GS | 458 | 367 (308–428) | 59 | 1 | 2 | 80% |
Position Room
15 WRs on the Sacramento State roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Matt Coleman | WR | SR | 36 | 473 | 4 | 24% | +0.42 |
| 12 | Onterrio Smith Jr. | WR | JR | 30 | 314 | 1 | 23% | +0.15 |
| 5 | Raiden Brown | WR | SO | 17 | 162 | 0 | 13% | -0.06 |
| 4 | Kenyon Shabazz | WR | JR | 5 | 79 | 1 | 6% | +0.79 |
| Jace Wilson | WR | 4 | 52 | 1 | 7% | +0.72 | ||
| Khai Taylor | WR | 3 | 14 | 0 | 5% | +0.17 | ||
| 9 | Ajon Bryant | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | Drey Garner | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | Dezmyn Hardy | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | Guy Fernandez III | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | Kenneth Peevy | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Carlton Perrilliat | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Matthew Auau | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 83 | Jaxon Fresques | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| Ellijah Washington | WR | — | — | — | 0% | -1.04 |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Sacramento State depth chart →