Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 26 | — |
| Target share | 14.1% | 360th / 522 |
| Catch rate | 57.7% | 374th / 522 |
| Success rate per target | 42.3% | 353rd / 522 |
| Yards per target | 5.7 | 439th / 522 |
| Explosive catches | 3.8% | 457th / 522 |
| Deep-target rate | 11.5% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 5 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 3 | — |
Charting
Where Brown's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted31 targets charted
Game Log
Raiden Brown's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long |
| 1 | @ Eastern Michigan | L 17–28 | 6.4 | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 0 | 20 |
| 1 |  Mississippi Valley State | W 52–0 | 3.3 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
| 2 | @ Fresno State | L 3–49 | 4.6 | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 11 |
| 3 |  North Dakota State | L 10–31 | 6.0 | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 0 | 11 |
| 4 |  Massachusetts | L 6–35 | 7.5 | 6 | 61 | 10.2 | 0 | 14 |
| 6 | @ Bowling Green | L 10–38 | — | · | · | · | · | · |
| 7 |  Ohio | L 7–48 | 4.8 | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 | 13 |
| 2026 · 7 games | 5.4 | 17 | 162 | 9.5 | 0 | 20 | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Rushing | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Carries | 2 | — |
| Yards | 14 | 960th / 1453 |
| Yards / carry | 7 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 24 | — |
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 17 | 294th / 1994 |
| Yards | 162 | 451st / 1980 |
| Yards / catch | 9.5 | 378th / 461 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 20 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 1 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Eastern Michigan | ✓ WR | 63 | ~48 (32–58) | 6 | 76% |
| Wk 1 · Mississippi Valley State | ✓ WR | 71 | ~18 (6–25) | 1 | 25% |
| Wk 2 · Fresno State | — | 66 | ~39 (12–53) | 3 | 59% |
| Wk 3 · North Dakota State | — | 66 | ~40 (26–49) | 5 | 61% |
| Wk 4 · Massachusetts | ✓ WR | 77 | ~68 (45–77) | 15 | 88% |
| Wk 6 · Bowling Green | ✓ WR | 63 | ~39 (12–53) | 3 | 62% |
| Wk 7 · Ohio | ✓ WR | 52 | ~31 (10–42) | 3 | 60% |
| Season | 5 GS | 458 | 283 (237–330) | 36 | 62% |
Position Room
15 WRs on the Sacramento State roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Matt Coleman | WR | SR | 36 | 473 | 4 | 24% | +0.42 |
| 12 | Onterrio Smith Jr. | WR | JR | 30 | 314 | 1 | 23% | +0.15 |
| 5 | Raiden Brown | WR | SO | 17 | 162 | 0 | 13% | -0.06 |
| 4 | Kenyon Shabazz | WR | JR | 5 | 79 | 1 | 6% | +0.79 |
| Jace Wilson | WR | 4 | 52 | 1 | 7% | +0.72 | ||
| Khai Taylor | WR | 3 | 14 | 0 | 5% | +0.17 | ||
| 9 | Ajon Bryant | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | Drey Garner | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | Dezmyn Hardy | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | Guy Fernandez III | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | Kenneth Peevy | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Carlton Perrilliat | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Matthew Auau | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 83 | Jaxon Fresques | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| Ellijah Washington | WR | — | — | — | 0% | -1.04 |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Sacramento State depth chart →