Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Defense | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Havoc plays | 2 | 1186th / 2573 |
| Tackles for loss | 1 | 1083rd / 1911 |
| Run stops | 5 | 1339th / 3263 |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| Pass breakups | 1 | — |
| Interceptions | 0 | — |
| Forced fumbles | 0 | — |
| Tackles | 24 | — |
Charting
Where Denson's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
The play-by-play names the defender on breakups, interceptions and tackles, but not the man in coverage on every throw, so true times-targeted isn't in the text. Coverage plays is the closest stand-in; exact targets come from hand charting.
Career
4 seasons at 2 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD | Havoc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Ole Miss#11 · 5-1 | 4 | 68% | 30 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 2025 |  Florida#53 · 4-8 | 10 | 65% | 52 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 2024 | Florida#24 · 8-5 | 11 | 31% | 36 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 2023 | Florida#55 · 5-7 | 5 | 3% | 5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Sharif Denson's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Sharif Denson's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Defense | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Tackles | 30 | 440th / 5408 |
| Solo | 23 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 2 | 760th / 2450 |
| Sacks | 0 | — |
| QB hurries | 1 | 629th / 1380 |
| Passes defended | 1 | 704th / 1589 |
| Defensive TD | 0 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Opp. plays | Est. snaps | Plays made | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 3 · LSU | ✓ S | 69 | ~69 (28–69) | 8 | · | 100% |
| Wk 4 · Florida | ✓ S | 76 | ~73 (29–76) | 5 | 1 | 96% |
| Wk 6 · Vanderbilt | — | 73 | ~71 (29–73) | 8 | · | 97% |
| Wk 7 · Missouri | — | 70 | ~70 (28–70) | 9 | · | 100% |
| Season | 2 GS | 417 | 283 (201–322) | 30 | 1 | 68% |
Position Room
24 DBs on the Ole Miss roster, ordered by tkl
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Tkl | TFL | Sacks | INT | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Sharif Denson | S | SR | 30 | 2 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 2 | Jaylon Braxton | CB | JR | 23 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 8 | Antonio Kite | CB | SR | 19 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 6 | Joenel Aguero | S | SR | 18 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 14 | Edwin Joseph | S | JR | 18 | 0 | 0 | — | 2 |
| 0 | Jalyn Crawford | CB | JR | 14 | 0.5 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 31 | Ladarian Clardy | S | SO | 9 | 0.5 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 24 | Andy Jaffe | S | JR | 8 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 29 | Nick Cull | S | SR | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Isreal Solomon | CB | 6 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | ||
| 28 | Dante Core | CB | FR | 5 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Anthony Robinson III | S | 5 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | ||
| 19 | MJ Preston | S | FR | 4 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
| 16 | Dorian Barney | CB | FR | 3 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 13 | Cedrick Beavers | CB | SR | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 39 | Gerald Lacy Jr. | S | JR | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 34 | Iverson McCoy | CB | FR | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Craig Tutt | S | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | ||
| 21 | Tavoy Feagin | CB | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | Maison Dunn | CB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | Pat Broomfield | CB | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | Victor Lincoln Jr. | CB | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | John Ross Ashley | CB | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | Nascar McCoy | S | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes —+ plays per team game. Ole Miss depth chart →