Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 7 | — |
| Target share | 4.6% | — |
| Catch rate | 71.4% | — |
| Success rate per target | 57.1% | — |
| Yards per target | 10.0 | — |
| Explosive catches | 0.0% | — |
| Deep-target rate | 0.0% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 1 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 0 | — |
Charting
Where Fuhrmann's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted7 targets charted
Game Log
Isaiah Fuhrmann's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
Mercer
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 6 | 879th / 1995 |
| Yards | 83 | 768th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 13.8 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 19 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Colorado | 54 | ~25 (8–34) | 1 | · | 46% |
| Wk 2 · Tennessee | 71 | ~35 (11–48) | 1 | · | 49% |
| Wk 3 · Mercer | 62 | ~17 (5–23) | 1 | · | 27% |
| Wk 6 · Duke | 57 | ~39 (12–53) | 2 | · | 68% |
| Wk 7 · Virginia Tech | 59 | ~32 (10–44) | 2 | 1 | 54% |
| Season | 373 | 148 (84–195) | 7 | 1 | 40% |
Position Room
14 WRs on the Georgia Tech roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Jordan Allen | WR | SO | 38 | 432 | 1 | 22% | +0.76 |
| 7 | Dalen Penson | WR | SO | 22 | 340 | 1 | 14% | +0.91 |
| 13 | Isaiah Fuhrmann | WR | JR | 6 | 83 | 0 | 5% | +0.68 |
| 16 | Jaiven Plummer | WR | SR | 4 | 82 | 3 | 6% | +1.23 |
| 3 | Rahkeem Smith | WR | SR | 2 | 12 | 0 | 4% | +0.14 |
| 6 | Debron Gatling | WR | JR | 2 | 54 | 1 | 4% | +1.69 |
| 21 | Darnell Collins | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | Joseph Moseley | WR | JR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | Wills Campbell | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 81 | Cal Faulkner | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 82 | Kentrell Davis | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Evan Haynes | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 87 | Coi Jean-Noel | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 89 | Chris Elko | WR | SR | — | — | — | 4% | -0.40 |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Georgia Tech depth chart →