#0
Stanford · 2026

Caden High

WRSenior5' 10", 165 lbsAtlanta, GA
Stanford Cardinal3-4 · TDC #104
Snap share
52%
1 of 6 started · likely 32–63%
Receptions
21
199th of 1995 in FBS
Rec. yards
307
161st of 1981 in FBS
Yards / catch
14.6
133rd of 461 in FBS
Rec. TD
3
93rd of 825 in FBS
EPA / play
+0.55
137th of 319 WR/TEs

Efficiency & Role

EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies

EPA per play by situation

35 plays · +19.1 total EPA · 137th of 319 qualifying WR/TEs
All plays+0.55
Passing+0.61
Rushing-1.71
1st down+0.53
2nd down+0.30
3rd down+1.18
Standard downs+0.44
Passing downs+0.82
HighWR/TE average

Share of team plays

How often the offense runs through this player. Pass = targets or dropbacks, rush = carries
All plays9%
Pass plays16%
Run plays1%
1st down7%
2nd down14%
3rd down9%
Standard downs10%
Passing downs7%
HighWR/TE average

Advanced

Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume

ReceivingValueFBS rank
Targets28—
Target share18.4%199th / 523
Catch rate60.7%338th / 523
Success rate per target53.6%179th / 523
Yards per target9.3171st / 523
Explosive catches10.7%282nd / 523
Deep-target rate7.1%—
3rd-down targets6—
Red-zone targets4—

Charting

Where High's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play

Targets
34
21 caught (62%)
Avg. depth of target
9.4
air yards per target
YAC per catch
5.9
118 yds after the catch
Air yards caught
170
of 288 yds on charted catches
Deep targets
9%
20+ air yards

Where he's targeted33 targets charted

62% comp9.4 avg. depth5.9 YAC/catch9% 20+ air yds3–0 TD–INT
101020203030LOSLeft, Behind air yards: 2 targets (6%), 1 caught (50%), 7 yds, 3.5 per target250% · 7yLeft, 0–4 air yards: 3 targets (9%), 3 caught (100%), 17 yds, 5.7 per target3100% · 17yLeft, 5–9 air yards: 2 targets (6%), 1 caught (50%), 9 yds, 4.5 per target250% · 9yLeft, 10–14 air yards: 5 targets (15%), 2 caught (40%), 26 yds, 5.2 per target540% · 26yLeft, 15–19 air yards: 1 targets (3%), 1 caught (100%), 16 yds, 16.0 per target1100% · 16yLeft, 20–29 air yards: noneLeft, 30+ air yards: 1 targets (3%), 1 caught (100%), 52 yds, 52.0 per target1100% · 52yMiddle, Behind air yards: noneMiddle, 0–4 air yards: noneMiddle, 5–9 air yards: 2 targets (6%), 1 caught (50%), 10 yds, 5.0 per target250% · 10yMiddle, 10–14 air yards: 5 targets (15%), 1 caught (20%), 18 yds, 3.6 per target520% · 18yMiddle, 15–19 air yards: 1 targets (3%), 1 caught (100%), 15 yds, 15.0 per target1100% · 15yMiddle, 20–29 air yards: 1 targets (3%), 0 caught (0%), 0 yds, 0.0 per target10% · 0yMiddle, 30+ air yards: noneRight, Behind air yards: 2 targets (6%), 2 caught (100%), 9 yds, 4.5 per target2100% · 9yRight, 0–4 air yards: 3 targets (9%), 2 caught (67%), 17 yds, 5.7 per target367% · 17yRight, 5–9 air yards: 2 targets (6%), 2 caught (100%), 20 yds, 10.0 per target2100% · 20yRight, 10–14 air yards: 1 targets (3%), 0 caught (0%), 0 yds, 0.0 per target10% · 0yRight, 15–19 air yards: 1 targets (3%), 1 caught (100%), 20 yds, 20.0 per target1100% · 20yRight, 20–29 air yards: 1 targets (3%), 1 caught (100%), 52 yds, 52.0 per target1100% · 52yRight, 30+ air yards: none
fewer more targets
Direction and air yards come from the play-by-play (left / middle / right thirds of the field), so each glow sits in its zone rather than on an exact spot. Hover a zone for detail.
2025 charting · Stanford

2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (5 of High’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.

Charted targets
28
18 caught (64%)
Avg. depth of target
10.5
air yards per target
YAC per catch
2.6
47 yds after the catch
Air yards caught
134
of 181 yds on charted catches
Deep targets
18%
20+ air yards

Where he's targeted28 targets charted

65% comp10.5 avg. depth2.6 YAC/catch18% 20+ air yds1–0 TD–INT
101020203030LOSLeft, Behind air yards: 1 targets (4%), 1 caught (100%), 6 yds, 6.0 per target1100% · 6yLeft, 0–4 air yards: 4 targets (14%), 4 caught (100%), 27 yds, 6.8 per target4100% · 27yLeft, 5–9 air yards: 2 targets (7%), 2 caught (100%), 17 yds, 8.5 per target2100% · 17yLeft, 10–14 air yards: noneLeft, 15–19 air yards: 2 targets (7%), 1 caught (50%), 15 yds, 7.5 per target250% · 15yLeft, 20–29 air yards: 2 targets (7%), 1 caught (50%), 21 yds, 10.5 per target250% · 21yLeft, 30+ air yards: 1 targets (4%), 0 caught (0%), 0 yds, 0.0 per target10% · 0yMiddle, Behind air yards: 1 targets (4%), 1 caught (100%), 0 yds, 0.0 per target1100% · 0yMiddle, 0–4 air yards: 3 targets (11%), 3 caught (100%), 11 yds, 3.7 per target3100% · 11yMiddle, 5–9 air yards: noneMiddle, 10–14 air yards: 1 targets (4%), 1 caught (100%), 23 yds, 23.0 per target1100% · 23yMiddle, 15–19 air yards: noneMiddle, 20–29 air yards: noneMiddle, 30+ air yards: noneRight, Behind air yards: noneRight, 0–4 air yards: 1 targets (4%), 0 caught (0%), 0 yds, 0.0 per target10% · 0yRight, 5–9 air yards: 5 targets (18%), 2 caught (40%), 17 yds, 3.4 per target540% · 17yRight, 10–14 air yards: 2 targets (7%), 1 caught (50%), 12 yds, 6.0 per target250% · 12yRight, 15–19 air yards: 1 targets (4%), 0 caught (0%), 0 yds, 0.0 per target10% · 0yRight, 20–29 air yards: 1 targets (4%), 0 caught (0%), 0 yds, 0.0 per target10% · 0yRight, 30+ air yards: 1 targets (4%), 1 caught (100%), 32 yds, 32.0 per target1100% · 32y
fewer more targets
Direction and air yards come from the play-by-play (left / middle / right thirds of the field), so each glow sits in its zone rather than on an exact spot. Hover a zone for detail.

Career

2 seasons since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play

SeasonTeamGSnapsRecRec ydsRec TDTgt share
2026 so farStanford#104 · 3-4652%21307318.4%
2025Stanford#93 · 4-81267%37414114.0%

Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Caden High's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.

Game Log

Caden High's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game

6.5 avg. game scoreBest: 8.9 vs Georgia Tech (Week 4)1 of 6 games at 8.0+
Receiving
WkOpponentResultGame scoreRecYdsY/RTDLong
1Hawai'iW 37–27—no stats recorded
1MiamiL 6–457.769215.3020
3@DukeL 7–356.85438.6115
4Georgia TechW 34–278.9412130.3252
5@Wake ForestL 3–574.72105.009
6@Notre DameL 7–587.036421.3052
7ElonW 34–74.0177.007
2026 · 6 games6.52133716.0352

2026 Season Stats

FBS rank among qualifying players

Rushing2026FBS rank
Carries1—
Yards-41367th / 1456
Yards / carry-4—
Touchdowns0—
Long0—
Receiving2026FBS rank
Receptions21199th / 1995
Yards307161st / 1981
Yards / catch14.6133rd / 461
Touchdowns393rd / 825
Long52—
Defense2026FBS rank
Tackles14244th / 5408
Solo1—
Tackles for loss0—
Sacks0—
QB hurries0—
Passes defended0—
Defensive TD0—

Snaps by Game

Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works

GameStartTeam playsEst. snapsPlays involvedPlays madePenaltiesSnap share
Wk 1 · Miami—65~47 (31–57)7··72%
Wk 3 · Duke✓ WR58~49 (32–58)11··84%
Wk 4 · Georgia Tech—72~43 (28–52)6··60%
Wk 5 · Wake Forest—67~39 (12–53)4··58%
Wk 6 · Notre Dame—44~31 (10–42)41270%
Wk 7 · Elon—73~25 (8–34)3··34%
Season1 GS450234 (145–284)351252%

Position Room

15 WRs on the Stanford roster, ordered by rec

#PlayerPosClassRecYdsTDTgt shareEPA/play
0Caden HighWRSR21307316%+0.55
23Nico BrownWRJR18193117%+0.39
4Jordan OnovugheWRJR1615608%+0.54
11JonAnthony HallWRFR1322308%+0.67
89Atticus JosephWRFR88317%+0.65
2Zion RobinsonWRFR715508%-0.08
Liam ThorpeWR556010%+0.39
3Marcus BrownWRSO11002%+0.51
18Langdon HoraceWRFR1903%+0.58
14Dre PollardWRFR—————
15Carter ShawWRJR—————
19David PantelisWRSR———3%-1.17
22Daylen SharperWRFR—————
80Jacob ButlerWRFR———0%-1.23
82Tyler KuoWRJR———3%-0.46

Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Stanford depth chart →