Efficiency & Role
EPA = expected points added per play. Compared with every FBS WR/TE who qualifies
Advanced
Computed from every play, garbage time excluded. FBS rank among players with enough volume
| Receiving | Value | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | 43 | — |
| Target share | 22.1% | 120th / 523 |
| Catch rate | 44.2% | 493rd / 523 |
| Success rate per target | 39.5% | 391st / 523 |
| Yards per target | 6.1 | 418th / 523 |
| Explosive catches | 7.0% | 391st / 523 |
| Deep-target rate | 20.9% | — |
| 3rd-down targets | 8 | — |
| Red-zone targets | 9 | — |
Charting
Where Horton's plays went: throw and catch spots, air yards and yards after the catch, read from the play-by-play
Where he's targeted44 targets charted
2025 charting · Alabama
2025 season. ESPN's play-by-play only has throw and catch spots for part of 2025 (7 of Horton’s games here), so treat the maps as a sample.
Where he's targeted23 targets charted
Career
5 seasons at 3 schools since 2014 · box-score totals, snap share estimated from play-by-play
| Season | Team | G | Snaps | Rec | Rec yds | Rec TD | Tgt share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 so far |  Texas A&M#29 · 4-3 | 7 | 70% | 20 | 280 | 3 | 22.1% |
| 2025 |  Alabama#15 · 11-4 | 14 | 48% | 42 | 511 | 8 | 13.2% |
| 2024 |  Miami#10 · 10-3 | 12 | 62% | 56 | 616 | 5 | 13.4% |
| 2023 | Miami#33 · 7-6 | 6 | 16% | 13 | 168 | 1 | 8.0% |
| 2022 | Miami#82 · 5-7 | 1 | 4% | 1 | 6 | 0 | 2.4% |
Past seasons are summed from ESPN box scores; success rates and snap shares come from the play-by-play. Isaiah Horton's team rank is that season's final TDC rank. A dash means the stat wasn't recorded.
Game Log
Isaiah Horton's box score, game by game, from ESPN, with a 0–10 game score for each (hover it for how it works). Click a result for the full game
| Receiving | Returns | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Game score | Rec | Yds | Y/R | TD | Long | KR | KR yds | PR | PR yds | TD |
| 1 |  Missouri State | W 50–0 | 6.7 | 4 | 76 | 19.0 | 1 | 36 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 2 |  Arizona State | W 48–20 | 7.1 | 3 | 33 | 11.0 | 2 | 16 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 3 |  Kentucky | L 21–31 | 6.9 | 5 | 61 | 12.2 | 0 | 19 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 4 | @ LSU | L 6–35 | 6.2 | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 0 | 27 | · | · | 1 | 5 | · |
| 5 |  Arkansas | W 34–7 | 6.0 | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 0 | 28 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 6 | @ Missouri | L 6–27 | 5.5 | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 0 | 17 | · | · | · | · | · |
| 7 |  The Citadel | W 41–0 | 3.6 | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 | 10 | · | · | 1 | 3 | · |
| 2026 · 7 games | 6.0 | 20 | 280 | 14.0 | 3 | 36 | · | · | 2 | 8 | · | ||
2026 Season Stats
FBS rank among qualifying players
| Receiving | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Receptions | 20 | 218th / 1995 |
| Yards | 280 | 196th / 1981 |
| Yards / catch | 14 | 157th / 461 |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 93rd / 825 |
| Long | 36 | — |
| Fumbles | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Fumbles | 1 | — |
| Lost | 1 | — |
| Recovered | 0 | — |
| Punt returns | 2026 | FBS rank |
|---|---|---|
| Returns | 2 | — |
| Yards | 8 | — |
| Average | 4 | — |
| Touchdowns | 0 | — |
| Long | 5 | — |
Snaps by Game
Estimated snaps from a model trained on real NFL snap counts. Ranges in brackets are where the real number lands 80% of the time: wide for a single game, tighter over the season. How it works
| Game | Start | Team plays | Est. snaps | Plays involved | Special teams | Penalties | Snap share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 · Missouri State | ✓ WR | 87 | ~53 (35–65) | 8 | · | 1 | 61% |
| Wk 2 · Arizona State | ✓ WR | 60 | ~51 (34–60) | 7 | · | · | 85% |
| Wk 3 · Kentucky | ✓ WR | 84 | ~60 (39–73) | 9 | · | · | 71% |
| Wk 4 · LSU | ✓ WR | 59 | ~47 (31–57) | 8 | 1 | · | 80% |
| Wk 5 · Arkansas | — | 68 | ~50 (33–61) | 5 | · | · | 74% |
| Wk 6 · Missouri | — | 62 | ~42 (28–51) | 6 | · | · | 68% |
| Wk 7 · The Citadel | ✓ WR | 65 | ~38 (12–52) | 3 | 1 | · | 58% |
| Season | 5 GS | 485 | 341 (286–397) | 46 | 2 | 1 | 70% |
Position Room
13 WRs on the Texas A&M roster, ordered by rec
| # | Player | Pos | Class | Rec | Yds | TD | Tgt share | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mario Craver | WR | JR | 24 | 241 | 2 | 21% | +0.20 |
| 7 | Isaiah Horton | WR | SR | 20 | 280 | 3 | 19% | +0.11 |
| 18 | TK Norman | WR | SO | 11 | 179 | 0 | 8% | +0.65 |
| 3 | Aaron Gregory | WR | FR | 10 | 135 | 3 | 10% | +0.56 |
| 6 | Terry Bussey | WR | JR | 7 | 92 | 0 | 15% | +0.61 |
| 8 | Ashton Bethel-Roman | WR | JR | 7 | 56 | 0 | 8% | -0.16 |
| 11 | Kelshaun Johnson | WR | SO | 4 | 34 | 0 | 5% | +0.71 |
| Jayden Warren | WR | 2 | 18 | 0 | 4% | -0.25 | ||
| 20 | Mike Brown | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 80 | Jerome Myles | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 83 | Will Hargett | WR | SO | — | — | — | — | — |
| 84 | Blake Buntyn | WR | FR | — | — | — | — | — |
| 85 | Chase Burton | WR | SR | — | — | — | — | — |
Stats, EPA and usage come from CollegeFootballData.com and refresh daily. FBS ranks only count players with enough volume for the stat to mean something. Qualifying for EPA takes 4+ plays per team game. Texas A&M depth chart →